Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Incentive Scheme and its Influence on Construction Project Performance

Henry Adelakun

Abstract


Incentive is motivation given to employees in order to boost their morale in performing better at their task. Type of incentive scheme and method of application used can influence satisfaction derived by individual employee. This paper examines challenges to effective incentive scheme and benefits of incentives to construction industry. Data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to professionals in building industry. Data collected were analyzed using descriptive i.e., mean and ranking. It could be deduced that quality of supervision was ranked the highest among the challenging factors to effective incentive scheme while payment scored the least with mean score of 3.52. Increase in productivity of workers was concluded to be the highest benefit to construction industry with mean score of 4.39 while effective communication was analyzed to be the least. It concluded that individual need must be identified before any incentive scheme is introduced to worker. It recommended that thorough supervision and monitoring should be in place to follow up any incentive introduced o get a desired result, feedback and improve promptly in areas where there are needs.


Full Text:

PDF

References


AINA Omotayo Olugbenga, Performance of Incentive Schemes in Construction Projects in Nigeria. Global J Manage Bus Res. 2011; 11(10): 38–44p.

Aina Omotayo Olugbenga, Adesanya David Abiodun, Factors Affecting Performance of Incentive Schemes in the Construction Industry in Nigeria. Int J Civil Environ Res. 2015; 7(8): 81–89p.

Azasu S. Incentive Plans Within Real Estate Firms – A Partial Review of Existing Literature. Working Paper No 51, Real Estate Economics, 2003. Retrieved from: http://eres.scix.net/data/works/att/db82.content.00379.pdfAzasu

McKenzie R, Lee D. Managing through Incentives: How to Develop a More Collaborative, Productive, and Profitable Organization. Oxford University Press USA, 1998.

Brown M, Heywood J S. Paying for performance: an international comparison. London, M. E. Sharpe, 2002.

Saka N, Ajayi OM. A Comparative Assessment of Incentive Scheme between Indigenous and Multinational Construction Contractors in Nigeria, in: C. Egbu (Ed.), in: Prosc. 26th Annual ARCOM conference, association of researchers in construction management, Leeds, UK, 6–8 September 2010, 583–591p.

Laufer A, Moore BE. Attitudes Toward Productivity Pay Programmes, J Constr Eng Manage. 1983; 109(1): 89–101p.

Liska RW, Snell B. Financial Incentive Programs for Average-size Construction Firm, J Constr Eng Manage. 1992; 118(4).

Aina O O, Ayangade JA, Omojola SO. The Impact of Group Incentives on Construction Workers’ Performance in Nigeria. Int J Civil Eng Constr Estate Manage. 2015; 5(93): 11–19p.

Aaronson D. A note on the benefits of homeownership, J Urban Econ. 2012; 47: 356–369p.

Liska and Snell, Management capabilities at the time of a program’s implementation, 2000.

Khan M S. Methods of Motivating for Increased Productivity. J Manage Eng. ASCE. 9: 2003; 1-7p

Camarero C, José Garrido M. Incentives, Organizational Identification, and Relationship Quality among Members of Fine Arts Museums, J Service Management, 2011; 22(2): 266–287p.

Proceedings 26th Annual ARCOM Conference, 6-8 September 2010, Leeds, UK.

Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Vol. 1, 583–91.

Saka, N and Ajayi, O M .A comparative assessment of incentive scheme between indigenous and multinational construction contractors in Nigeria. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM Conference, UK, 2010, 583-591.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.