Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Discomfort Analysis in Pneumatic Grinding: Steam Generator Manufacturing Industry

MANI CHIDAMBARAM, Sankaranarayanasamy Krishnasamy, Muthukumar Krishnamoorthy

Abstract


Steam generator manufacturing involves a lot of custom designed components requiring intensive fabrication activities of welding and grinding. Pneumatic grinding machines of different types are widely used in such industries as they offer flexibility and ease of use. However, the deployment of pneumatic tools are associated with hand transmitted vibration and related health issues. The present study aims to evaluate the extent of discomfort levels of operators and its relationship with the grinding intensity and at various times of the day. Pneumatic grinding operators involved in manufacturing steam generator components were chosen and data was collected based on Corlett and Bishop’s body part discomfort mapping, at various time intervals from starting to end of the shift, using a structured questionnaire. ANOVA was deployed to carry out the statistical analysis. The grinding operators working in ‘drums and headers’ product group reported the maximum discomfort compared to operators working in other product groups. The discomfort increases as the shift progresses and reaches the highest at the end of the shift. The study also brought out that most operators reported discomfort in ‘shoulder’ (93%), followed by wrist (85%), neck (70%), lower back (65%) and forearm (61%). Apart from providing leather and anti-vibration protective gloves to the grinding operators, the industry is working to reduce hand arm vibration problems by experimenting with modified handles and lower weight grinders. In addition to that, distributing the exposure of grinding operators amongst different product groups could bring a balance in discomfort faced by them, by periodical job rotation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Hand-Arm vibration exposure in aircraft manufacture: Measures of vibration attenuation. Uwe Kaulbars BG-Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BGIA) Sankt Augustin, Germany-2nd American Conference on Human Vibration. Jun 4–6, 2008.

Putz-Anderson, V. Cumulative Trauma Disorders, Taylor & Francis, London, 1988; 3–7p.

Griffin MJ. Handbook of Human Vibration, Academic Press, London, 1990.

Pelmear PL, Wasserman DE. Hand-Arm Vibration: A Comprehensive Guide for Occupational Health Professionals, OEM Press, Beverly Farms, MA, USA, 1998.

Aiba Y, Ohshiba S, Ishizuka H, Sakamotok K, Moriokai I, Miyashita K, Iwata H. A study on the effects of counter measures for vibrating tool workers using an impact wrench. Industrial Health. 1999; 37(4): 426–431p.

Griffin MJ, Bovenzi M. The diagnosis of disorders caused by hand transmitted vibration: Southampton Workshop 2000. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 75 (1e2), 1e5.

Gemne G, Taylor W. Foreword: Hand-Arm Vibration and the Central Autonomic Nervous System. Journal of Low Frequency Noise and Vibration, 1983; Special 1–12.

Erica W, CMAJ, Lina Lande: Hand–arm vibration syndrome. CMAJ. Apr. 12 2005; 172(8): 1001–1002p.

NIOSH, Musculoskeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors: A Critical Review of Epidemiologic Evidence for Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Neck, Upper Extremity, and Low Back (NIOSH Publication No. 97–141), Cincinnati, OH, US, 1997.

Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Workplace Exposure to Vibration in Europe an Expert Review. Luxemburg, 2008.

ISO 5349-1. Mechanical vibration measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand-transmitted vibration. Part 1: General Guidelines; 2000.

Laskar MS, Harada N. Different conditions of cold water immersion test for diagnosing hand-arm vibration syndrome. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine. 2005; 10: 351e359

Rui F, D’Agostin F, Negro C, Bovezi M. A prospective cohort study of manipulative dexterity in vibration-exposed workers. International Archives of Occupational Environmental Health. 2008; 81: 545e551p.

Rundmo T. Associations between risk perception and safety. SafSci. 1996; 24: 197–209p.

Stewart-Taylor AJ, Cherrie JW. Does risk perception affect behaviour and exposure? A pilot study amongst asbestos workers. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998; 42: 565–9p.

Rother M, Shook J, Womack J, Jones D. Learning to see -Value stream mapping to add value and eliminate muda. Brookline (MA): Lean Enterprise Institute. 2001; 102p.

Kazmierczak K, Mathiassen SE, Forsman M, Winkel J. An integrated analysis of ergonomics and time consumption in Swedish ‘craft-type’ car disassembly. Appl Ergon. 2005; 36: 263–73p.

Peterssona NF, Mathiassena SE, Björingc G, Winkela J. The accuracy of self-rating of exposure to repetitive work. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000; 25: 239–46p.

Mortimer M, Hjelm EW, Wiktorina C, Pernolda G, Kilbom Å, Vingård E. Validity of self-reported duration of work postures obtained by interview. MUSIC-Norrtaälje Study Group. Appl Ergon. 1999; 30: 477–86p.

Corlett EN, Bishop RP. A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics. 1976; 19: 175–82p.

Muthukumar K, Sankaranarayanasamy K, Ganguli AK. Discomfort Analysis in Computerized Numeric Control Machine Operations. Saf Health Work. Jun 2012; 3(2): 146–153p.

Moriguchi CS, Alencar JF, Miranda-Júnior LC, Coury HJCG Rev Bras Fisioter. Musculoskeletal symptoms among energy distribution network linemen. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy – Musculoskeletal. 2009; 13(2).

Nag, Desai H, Nag PK. Work Stress of Women in Sewing Machine Operation. Journal of Human Ergo. Jun 1992; 21(1); 47–55p.

Serratos-Perez JN, Mendiola-Anda C. Musculoskeletal disorders among male sewing machine. Ergonomics. Jul 1993; 36(7): 793–800p.

Kuruva Gopanna K, Sankaranarayana-samy K, Muthukumar, Ganguli AK. Evaluation of Forklifts for Operator Comfort. International Journal of Engineering Innovation




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3759/joise.v3i3.3524

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.