Analysis of the Extent of Patients’ Rehabilitation from Knee Injuries or Surgery using Recovery Indices

Parichit Kumar, Codanda Devaiah Monappa, Akshay Rao, S. M. Kulkarni

Abstract


Many major knee surgeries or injuries have long rehabilitation periods, during which the patients may have abnormal gait cycles. The patient transitions to independent exercises performed at home, which are crucial to recovery. Doctors need to have a means to closely track patients exercises for proper recovery. This research utilizes statistical analysis tools, which is applied to analyze gait parameters of patients undergoing the rehabilitation process at different stages of recovery. Open source electronics, which were used for their affordability, identify and datalog variables like orientation (yaw, pitch, roll and time) and GRF to calculate important gait parameters. These parameters are used to study the different aspects of the patient’s performance and aids doctors track the progress of the patients at critical recovery periods. This research eliminates use of intuitive examination, and provides quantitative insight on the patients’ rehabilitation. Metrics such as cadence, stance time, weight distribution are determined from the data obtained from the device. A series of experiments were conducted using these sensors to relate the gait parameters to the recovery of forty people in the age group of 18–24. The collected results were used to create recovery indices for all specified metrics, which aid the doctors to objectively identify the extent of recovery. From the analysis, it was determined that patients with recent or ongoing rehabilitation are 10% (injured 6 months ago) to 40% (people injured recently) from optimal. Confirmation diagnosis were conducted to verify the results of the recovery indices and there was close agreement between the analysis and actual diagnosis.

Cite this Article

Parichit Kumar, Codanda Devaiah Monappa, Akshay Rao, et al. Analysis of the Extent of patients’ rehabilitation from knee injuries or surgery using recovery indices. Journal of Mechatronics and Automation. 2017; 4(3): 28–41p.


Keywords


Gait, recovery index, knee rehabilitation, wearable sensors, open source data loggers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bassett, Sandra. ”Measuring Patient Adherence To Physiotherapy”. Journal of Novel Physiotherapies 02.07 (2012): n. pag. Web.

Herbold, Janet A., Kristen Bonistall, and Mary Beth Walsh. ”Rehabilitation

Following Total Knee Replacement, Total Hip Replacement, And

Hip Fracture”. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy 34.4 (2011): 155-

Web.

Chiang, Chih-Yen et al. ”Data Collection And Analysis Using Wearable

Sensors For Monitoring Knee Range Of Motion After Total Knee

Arthroplasty”. Sensors 17.3 (2017): 418. Web.

Dejnabadi, H. et al. ”13.7 Joint Angle Monitoring In Osteoarthritis

Patients Using Body-Fixed Sensors”. Gait Posture 21 (2005): S76-S77.

Web.

Zebolds, Silvestris et al. ”Gait Analysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty In

Dysplastic Hip Patients”. Gait Posture 38 (2013): S99. Web.

Najafi, B. et al. ”Measurement Of Stand-Sit And Sit-Stand Transitions

Using A Miniature Gyroscope And Its Application In Fall Risk Evaluation

In The Elderly”. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

8 (2002): 843-851. Web.

Amano, Tetsuya et al. ”Factors For Assessing The Effectiveness Of

Early Rehabilitation After Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty:

A Prospective Cohort Study”. PLOS ONE 11.7 (2016): e0159172. Web.

Gauchard, Grome C. et al. ”Impact Of Pre-Operative Regular Physical

Activity On Balance Control Compensation After Vestibular Schwannoma

Surgery”. Gait Posture 37.1 (2013): 82-87. Web.

Chen, Kun-Hui et al. ”Wearable Sensor-Based Rehabilitation Exercise

Assessment For Knee Osteoarthritis”. Sensors 15.2 (2015): 4193-4211.

Web.

Tao, Weijun et al. ”Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors”. Sensors

12 (2012): 2255-2283. Web.

Hanlon, Michael, and Ross Anderson. ”Real-Time Gait Event Detection

Using Wearable Sensors”. Gait Posture 24 (2006): S127-S128. Web.

Watanabe, Takashi et al. ”A Preliminary Test Of Measurement Of Joint

Angles And Stride Length With Wireless Inertial Sensors For Wearable

Gait Evaluation System”. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

(2011): 1-12. Web.

Tognetti, Alessandro et al. ”Wearable Goniometer And Accelerometer

Sensory Fusion For Knee Joint Angle Measurement In Daily Life”.

Sensors 15.11 (2015): 28435-28455. Web.

Braito, Matthias et al. ”Knee Extensor Strength And Gait Characteristics

After Minimally Invasive Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Vs Minimally

Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial”.

The Journal of Arthroplasty 31.8 (2016): 1711-1716. Web.

Lullini, G. et al. ”Are Modern Inertial Sensor And Bio-Feedback

Based Rehabilitation Systems Reliable Enough? A Validation Study By

Standard Gait Analysis”. Gait Posture 39 (2014): S42-S43. Web.

Wren, Tishya A.L. et al. ”Efficacy Of Clinical Gait Analysis: A

Systematic Review”. Gait Posture 34.2 (2011): 149-153. Web.

Lin, Jonathan F S, and Dana Kuli. ”Human Pose Recovery Using

Wireless Inertial Measurement Units”. Physiological Measurement 33.12

(2012): 2099-2115. Web.

Giggins, Oonagh M, Kevin T Sweeney, and Brian Caulfield. ”Rehabilitation

Exercise Assessment Using Inertial Sensors: A Cross-Sectional

Analytical Study”. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 11.1

(2014): 158. Web.

Takashi Watanabe, Hiroki Saito, Eri Koike, and Kazuki Nitta, A

Preliminary Test of Measurement of Joint Angles and Stride Length

with Wireless Inertial Sensors for Wearable Gait Evaluation System,

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Volume 2011, Article ID

, 12 pages.

Tarni, Daniela. ”Wearable sensors used for human gait analysis.”

Romanian journal of morphology and embryology 57.2 (2016): 373-382.

Mark Fenton, ”The Complete Guide to Walking for Health, Weight

Loss, and Fitness. (Lyons Press, 2008

Link to supplementary material -

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByYMaltDi0IueTBmUE52Q05DV2c

Code - https://www.arduino.cc/en/Main/Software




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joma.v4i3.134

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.