Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SMEs IN JABALPUR USING INTEGRATED PCA DEA MODEL

Murali Krishna M, Tarun Gupta

Abstract


An integrated principal component analysis and data envelopment analysis frame work has been adopted to assess and ranking of SMEs situated in Jabalpur. the results of the frame work shows the performance of SMEs : weak and strong points of each SME with regard to machinery and equipment. Moreover, the composite rank of the SMEs is calculated to assess the performance. Furthermore, it identifies which indicators have major impacts on the performance of SMEs.  To attain the objectives, a comprehensive study was conducted to identify all economic and technical indicators which influence the performance of SMEs. These performance indicators are: equipment productivity, efficiency, effectiveness and profitability. Standard factors such as down time, mean time between failure, time to repair, operating time, value added and production value were considered as shaping factors. The SMEs are selected according to the data provided by MSME- development institute (Ministry of MSME, Government of India).


Keywords


principal component analysis; data envelopment analysis; SME

Full Text:

PDF

References


Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978; vol 2(6): 429–444p.

Barreiros F. Designing and implementing a performance measurement system in a small company: The case of Estomeo – Dental Industry. 2013.

Bianchi C, Cosenz F, Marinković M. Designing dynamic performance management systems to foster SME competitiveness according to a sustainable development perspective: Empirical evidences from a case-study. Int J Bus Perform Manag. 2015; 16 (1): 84–108p.

Carpinetti LCR, Galdámez EVC, Gerolamo MC. A measurement system for managing performance of industrial clusters: A conceptual model and research cases. Int J Product Perform Manag. 2008; 57 (5): 405–419p.

Cook W.D, Tone K & Zhu, J. (2014). “Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model”, Omega, 44(C), 1–4

Garengo P, Biazzo S, Bititci U. Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev. 2005; 7 (1): 25–47p.

Hotelling H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933; 25: 417–441p.

Jamil ZM, Mohamed R. Performance measurement system (PMS) in small medium enterprises (SMEs): A practical modified framework. World J Soc Sci. 2011; 1 (3): 200–212p.

Massalla, C. (1994) Designing a Performance Measurement System for a Small Company: A Case Study. Operations Strategy and Performance (EurOMA Conference Proceedings), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp.325–330.

Monkhouse E. The role of competitive benchmarking in small- to medium-sized enterprises. Benchmarking Qual Manag Technol. 1995; 2 (4): 41–50p.

Phihlela TR, Odunaike SA. A measurement framework to assess SME performance. Proceedings of the International Systems Educators Conference. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. 2012.

Taticchi P, Balachandran KR, Botarelli M, Cagnazzo L. Performance measurement management for small and medium enterprises: An integrated approach. J Appl Manag Account Res. 2008; 6 (2): 57–71p.

Watts T, McNair-Connolly CJ. New performance measurement and management control systems. J Appl Account Res. 2012; 13 (3): 226–241p.

Wang Yu-Jie. Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl. 2008; 34 (3): 1837–1845p.

Wang Yu-Jie. Combining grey relation analysis with FMCGDM to evaluate financial performance of Taiwan container lines. Expert Syst Appl. 2009; 36 (2): 2424–2432p.

Wang Yu-Jie. The evaluation of financial performance for Taiwan container shipping companies by fuzzy TOPSIS. Appl Soft Comput. 2014; 22: 28–35p.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joprm.v8i2.1006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.