Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Analysis of Steel Beam Column Joint by Using Cantilever Weight by using ANSYS

vishawadeep ghodajkar, RAJMAHENDRA SAWANT

Abstract


The steel beam column joint is ideally pinned, semi rigid or fully rigid. As per previous study the semi rigid connections are subjected to moment rotation relationship joint of structure and the behavior of beam column joints in steel frames can be represented by its cantilever weight behavior which is primarily shown by the moment rotation relationship. During the past decade, extensive research has been conducted on the analysis and design of steel frames with semi rigid connections. After applying different cantilever weight on different connection by observing result it come to conclusion that top and seat angle connection gives good performance in different aspect


Full Text:

PDF

References


N. Krishnamurthy, “Modelling and Prediction of Steel Bolted Connection Behaviour”, Journal of computers & structures. Journal of Research gate Publication Vol. 2. (1980) pp. 75-82.

Norimitsu Kishi, Kenichi G. Matsuoka, Wai Fah Chen and Sumio G. Nomachi, “moment rotation relationship of Top and Seat Angle Connections”, (1987) pp. 163-172.

K. Vertes & M. Ivanyi, “Determination of the main characteristics of semi-rigid beam to column connections through numerical and experimental method”, Journal of High Performance Structures and Materials vol. II. (2004) pp. 677-684.

Ali Abolmaalia, John H. Matthysa,Mohammed Farooqib, Yeol Choic “Development of moment–rotation model equations for flush end-plate connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research vol.61 (2005), pp. 1595–1612.

Pirmoz and E. Mohammadrezapour, “Behavior of Bolted Top Seat Angle Connections under Combined Axial Tension and Moment Loading”, the 14 the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 2008, pp. 12-17

Concepcion Díaz, PascualMartí, Mariano Victoria, Osvaldo M.Querin, “Review on the modeling of joint behaviour in steel frames”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research Vol. 67 (2011), pp. 741–758.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3759/rtcet.v9i1.1404

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.