Flow Reversal and Pressure pulsation: Innovative technique to enhance flux in Nanofiltration
Keywords:
Nanofiltration, Flux, Resistance-in-series model, flow reversal, pressure pulsationAbstract
Reduction in Permeate flux with the period of time is the major drawback for the Pressure-driven membrane processes. Concentration polarization and membrane fouling are the two major limitations for the Pressure-driven membrane filtration processes. They lead to the severe flux decline and that need to be controlled for the better process efficiency. The resistance determination provides basis for selection of membrane and appropriate pressure –driven separation process. This paper outlines a new approach for the flux enhancement by investigating the two techniques namely flow reversal and pressure pulsation. Resistance –in-series model was applied to quantify and describes the co-relation of the resistances taking into account the membrane hydraulic resistance as a base factor. It is also observed that membrane permeability decreases rapidly due to pore blocking and further declination of the flux is due to graduation accumulation of the foulant over the membrane surface. It is observed that membrane hydraulic resistance, Rm remained constant during the whole experiments while there is a reduction of concentration polarization (CP) resistance, Rcp in case of frequent flow reversal i.e from 52.08 to 35.50 %. However, in pressure pulsation technique not much flux variation was found during pressure pulse at different intervals.
Keywords: Nanofiltration; Flux; Resistance-in-series model; flow reversal; pressure pulsation.
References
Ostadfar, A. and Rawicz, A., 2015. Effects of Pulsatile Flow and Backwashing on Plasma Flow Rate in an Implantable Plasmapheresis. I. Theory and Principle. Biomedical Engineering, 49(1), pp.29-32.
Nath, K., 2017. Membrane separation processes. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
Ilias, S., 2005. Flux Enhancement in Crossflow Membrane Filtration: Fouling and It's Minimization by Flow Reversal. North Carolina A&T State University.
Zhang, W., Luo, J., Ding, L. and Jaffrin, M.Y., 2015. A review on flux decline control strategies in pressure-driven membrane processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 54(11), pp.2843-2861.
Mehta, J.P., 2019. Improvement of Permeate flux by Laboratory Scale Techniques in Membrane Separation Processes. Journal of Modern Chemistry & Chemical Technology, 10(1), pp.21-27.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |