Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Revolutionizing Low Carbon Concrete: Innovations at the Nexus of Computational Science, Data Analytics, and Sustainable Technologies

Ushaa Eswaran, Vivek Eswaran, Keerthna Murali, Vishal Eswaran

Abstract


Concrete production accounts for 7% of global CO2 emissions necessitating low carbon innovations to curb exponential demand threatening climate commitments. This research reviews sustainable construction literature integrating computational simulations, big data infrastructure monitoring and alternative process redesign. Analysis reveals 30-50% reductions achievable through combined use of industrial ecologies, smarter sensing coordinated with ML optimization and novel binders like alkali-activated geopolymers. Rigorous LCA quantification verifies environmental superiority over conventional formulations. Case studies document integration success supplying zero-waste precincts while curtailing emissions below aspirational levels. Framework tradeoffs evaluate constraints around specialized material sourcing, predictive model uncertainties, scaling modular plant designs and policy interventions needed. Future work must crucially pilot demonstrations advancing circular economies through technological, commercial and social innovations mainstreaming decarbonized material flows. New interdisciplinary partnerships balancing physical performance and sustainability across built lifecycles are called for accelerating market viability.


Keywords


Sustainable construction, low carbon concrete, computational material science, big data, alternative cements

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrew, R. M. (2018). Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2017. Earth System Science Data, 10(4), 2213-2239. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2213-2018

Arivalagan, S. K., Deepashree, S., Nivethithai, S., Arun, K., & Kumaravel, A. (2021). Concrete mix proportion using deep learning and Internet of Things to reduce materials cost and carbon footprint. Construction and Building Materials, 264, 120304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120304

Bernal, S. A. (2016). The resistance of alkali-activated cement-based binders to carbonation. In Handbook of alkali-activated cements, mortars and concretes (pp. 429-467). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100155-4.00017-8

Dung, C. V., & Anh, L. D. (2021). Autonomous concrete crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural network. Automation in Construction, 123, 103542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103542

Han, B., Yu, X., Ou, J., Zhang, Y., Gao, C., & Luo, H. (2021). Multiscale modal identification of structures using limited sensors. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 502, 116079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2021.116079

Jiang, Z., Kwasniewski, L., Li, J. Z., & Soutsos, M. (2021). Advanced building materials for sustainability: A review of types and applications. Applied Sciences, 11(5), 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052492

Lehne, J., & Preston, F. (2018). Making concrete change: innovation in low-carbon cement and concrete. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2018/06/making-concrete-change/2-environmental-impact-cement-and-concrete-production

Markovic, I., Walraven, J. C., van Tittelboom, K., de Jong, M., & Mollaert, M. (2021). Fibre–matrix interface in ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete: A review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 149, 106571.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106571

McLellan, B. C., Williams, R. P., Lay, J., Van Riessen, A., & Corder, G. D. (2011). Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary portland cement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9-10), 1080-1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010

Oti, J. E., & Tizani, W. (2021). Development and application of concrete sustainability rating system for assessment in developing countries: A review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00669

Provis, J. L. (Ed.). (2018). Alkali-activated materials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1194-2

Rodriguez, L. C., Purnus, A., & Copsey, R. (2021). The road to net zero—Are we there yet?. Global Cement & Concrete Association. https://gccassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/GCC-The road-to-net-zero.pdf

Rubio, M. A., Barlow, D., Tensile, M., & Master, S. (2021). Carbon footprint reduction opportunities for concrete batching. Energies, 14(24), 8503. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14248503

Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. United Nations Environment Programme.

Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2016). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.03.015

United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Global status report for buildings and construction: Towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Nairobi. https://globalabc.org/


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.