Regression and ANN Models in Predicting Tool Wear

Authors

  • Mafiz Alji Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saraswati college of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Zain Bamne Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saraswati college of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Atique Kondvilkar Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saraswati college of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Umer Aklekar Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Saraswati college of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Paramjit Thakur Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Saraswati college of Engineering, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Keywords:

Tool wear, design of experiments (DOE), regression model, artificial neural network (ANN).

Abstract

A modern machining system must be able to detect tool wear while milling in order to maintain the product's surface quality. The vibration signatures produced by a single point cutting tool during machining have been found to be good predictors of the tool's health. The current study used Artificial Neural Networks to forecast tool life by analysing vibration signatures when turning EN9 and EN24 steel alloys (ANN). Tool wear prediction is critical in the business for increased productivity and product quality. Cutting tool flank wear is frequently used as a tool life criterion because it determines the diametric accuracy, stability, and dependability of machining. The main goal of this project is to extend the life of the cutting tool, resulting in a better surface finish, higher quality, and a reduction in manufacturing costs and time. In this project, we will forecast tool wear using two different models: regression mathematics and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The response (output) variable measured during milling in this study is tool wear (flank wear/crater wear), while the input variables are cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut.

References

Palanisamy P, Shanmugasundaram S, Rajendran I. Tool wear prediction using regression and ANN

in milling. 2006.

Gouariz A, Martinez G, Terrazos G, Benardos P, Ratchev S. In process Tool wear prediction system

based on machine learning techniques and force analysis. Procedia CIRP. 2018; 77: 501–504.

Twardowski P, Pikula MW. Prediction of tool wear using ANN during turning of hardened steel.

Materials. 2019; 12(19): 3091.

Oraby SE. Tool life determination based on the measurement of wear and force ration variation. Int

J Mach Tools Manuf. 2004; 44(12–13): 1261–1269.

Palanisamy P, Shanmugasundaram S. Modeling of tool wear and surface roughness in hard turning

using regression and ANN. Int J Mach Mach Mater. 2008; 4(1): 76–94.

Baig RU, Javed S, Khaisar M, Shakoor M, Raja P. Development of an ANN model for prediction

of tool wear in turning EN9 and EN24 steel alloy. Adv Mech Eng. 2021; 13(6): 1–14.

Pikula MW, Czyryca AF, Twardowski P. Tool wear prediction based on ANN during aluminum

matrix composite milling. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Oct 13; 20(20): 5798.

Kalidass S, Palanisamy P, Muthukumaran V. Tool wear prediction using regression and ANN in

end milling of AISI 304 austentic stainless steel. Int J Eng Innov Technol. 2014; 1(2): 29–36.

Palanisamy P, Shanmugasundaram S, Rajendran I. Optimization of machining parameters using

genetic algorithm and experimental validation for end milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.

; 32: 644–655.

Toh CK. Static and dynamic force analysis when high speed rough milling hardened steel. 2009.

Thinh HX. A study on tool wear in milling process. 2007.

Ezugwua EO, Fadarea DA, Bonneya J, Da Silvaa RB, Salesa WF. Modeling the correlation between

cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial

neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2005; 45(12–13): 1375–1385.

Pang JS, Ansari MNM, Zaroog Omar S, Ali Moaz H, Sapuan SM. Taguchi design optimization of

machining parameters on the CNC end milling process of halloysite nanotube with aluminium

reinforced epoxy matrix (HNT/Al/Ep) hybrid composite. HBRC J. 2014; 10(2): 138–144.

Damir Grguruas, Matjaz Kern, Franci Pusavec. Suitability of the full body ceramic end milling

tools for high-speed machining of nickel-based alloy Inconel 718. Procedia CIRP. 2018; 77: 630–

Cho S, Asfour S, Onar A, Kaundinya N. Tool breakage detection using support vector machine

learning in a milling process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2005; 45(3): 241–249.

Sarala Rubi C, Udaya Prakash J. Effect of Drilling Process Parameters on Surface Roughness of

LM6/B4C Composites. Int J Eng Adv Technol. 2019; 9(2): 3835–3838.

Richhetti A, Machado AR, Da Silva MB. Influence of the number of inserts for tool life evaluation

in face milling of steels. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2004; 44: 695–700.

ISO 8688-2: 1989. Tool life testing in milling, end milling.

Rahmath Ulla Baig, Syed Javed, Mohammed Khaisar, Mwafak Shakoor, Purushothaman Raja.

Development of an ANN model for prediction of tool wear in turning EN9 and EN24 steel alloy.

Adv Mech Eng. 2021; 13(6): 1–14.

Xu Chuangwen, Dou Jianming, Chai Yuzhen, Li Huaiyuan, Shi Zhicheng, Xu Jing. The

relationships between cutting parameters, tool wear, cutting force and vibration. Adv Mech Eng.

; 10(1): 1–14.

Zhe Wang, Lei Li. Optimization of process parameters for surface roughness and tool wear in

milling TC17 alloy using Taguchi with grey relational analysis. Adv Mech Eng. 2021; 13(2): 1–8.

Koshy P, Dumitrescu P, Ziada Y. Novel methods for rapid assessment of tool performance in

milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2004; 44(15): 1599–1605.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.