Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A General Study Work-Life Balance in Higher Education for Women in India

Akriti Nema

Abstract


Women's battle for faculty posts in athletic training Women in professor roles should have an equal
work-life balance. a work environment that values balance and gives women faculty members the
freedom to organize and prioritize their schedules is essential for achieving work-life harmony. It is
crucial for women to have support systems both inside and outside of the workplace if they are to be
able to manage their responsibilities. More than 85% of working women executives in higher education
say they put in more than 48 hours per week of normal work, and about 25% of them feel unable to
handle the stress and pressure they experience on a daily basis. later, the requirement to continue

working from home Formal working hours may be detrimental to both workers and their families. Work-
life balance refers to how one handles obligations at work and how one handles personal and family

duties outside of the office. These Phenomenological studies included work-family boundary theory and
generational Principles to guide and understand the notions of work-life balance. this research Focused
on three generations: Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y women Leadership roles in the
for-profit higher education industry. significance of study generational attitudes was designed to
increase understanding of how they cope, and their feelings of stress as a leader in proprietary higher
education, including: Similarities and differences across generations on the topic of work-life balance.


Keywords


Flexible workplace arrangements, support networks, organization and planning education, Youth Entrepreneurship Services Platform.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Perceptions of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I

female athletic trainers on motherhood and work-life balance: individual- and sociocultural- level

factors. J Athl Train. 2015;50(8):854–861.

Xie Xiulan. Characteristics and Enlightenment of Entrepreneurship Education in Foreign

Universities. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education, 2017 (1): 115-118.

Mi Yinjun, Jin Linlin, Luo Jiawen. Comparative Research and Practice on the Construction of

Entrepreneurship Education Curriculum System in University of Science and Technology. Higher

Education Exploration, 2017 (2): 124-128.

Wang Hongjun. Research on the Training Mechanism of Entrepreneurship Competency of

Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents - Taking Entrepreneurship in Cross-border

eCommerce as an example. Research on Science and Technology Management, 2018 (5): 139-144.

Ji Hui????sheng, Su Yanting. Analysis of E-commerce Entrepreneurial Model of College Students

and its Influencing Factors. Journal of Xiamen Institute of Technology, 2015 (06): 37-42.

Mao Haichao, Wang Hui. Exploration of E-commerce Entrepreneurship Mode for College

Students. China Market, 2015 (15): 67-68.

Li Yalian. Investigation of the Current Situation of Entrepreneurship of Contemporary College

Students and Research on Education Guidance Strategies. Education Research, 2017 (2): 65-72.

Sun Shanxue. Theor ethical Connotation and Practical Points of Industry Education Integration.

China Vocational and Technical Education, 2017 (34): 90 94.

Zhang Ying, Zhou Jing. Demand Analysis and Promotion Suggestions for the Integration of

Industry and Education in Vocational Education. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University

(SOCIAL SCIENCE), 2017,11 (06): 122-126.

Qin Buzzi. Application of Stakeholder Theory in Industry Education Integration. Think Tank Era,

(45): 30 + 169.

Qi Lihui, Chen Shihui. Research on Teaching Methods of Entrepreneurship Education in Higher

Vocational Colleges from the perspective of Constructivism Learning Theory. Jiangnan Forum,

(08): 51-52.

Naugle KE, Behar-Horenstein LS, Dodd VJ, Tillman MD, Borsa PA. Perceptions of wellness and

burnout among certified athletic trainers: sex differences. J Athl Train. 2013;48(3):424–430.

Perna LW. Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: the contributions of family ties. Res

High Educ. 2005;46(3):277–307.

Wolfinger HH, Mason MA, Goulden M. Problems in the pipeline: gender, marriage, and fertility

in the ivory tower. J High Educ. 2008;79(4):388–405.

Hakim C. Competing family models, competing social policies. Fam Matters. 2003; 64:52–61.

Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Perceptions of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I

female athletic trainers on motherhood and work-life balance: individual- and sociocultural- level

factors. J Athl Train. 2015;50(8):854–861.

Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Navigating motherhood and the role of the head athletic trainer in the

collegiate setting. J Athl Train. 2016;51(7):566–575.

Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Positive factors influencing the advancement of women to the role of

head athletic trainer in the National Collegiate Athletic Association Divisions II and III. J Athl

Train. 2016;51(7):550–556.

Mazerolle SM, Eason CM. Barriers to the role of the head athletic trainer for women in National

Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III settings. J Athl Train. 2016; 51(7):557–565.9

Woodward D. Work-life balance strategies used by women managers in British ‘‘modern’’

universities. Equal Oppor Int. 2007;26(1):6–17.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.