Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Operational Modeling of Cutting Parameters Influence on Power Consumption and Surface Roughness in CNC Turning of AISI 304

Dinesh Kumar, Rajiv Trehan, Gagandeep Singh

Abstract


This paper describes the power consumption and surface roughness predictive model development in computer numerical control (CNC) turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel using Taguchi method and response surface method (RSM). The experiments are designed and conducted based on Taguchi’s design of experiments (DoE) with cutting speed, feed rate, depth of cut and nose radius as the process parameters. Signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios of responses are calculated to identify the influences of process parameters on responses using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RS models such as linear, linear with interaction, linear with square and full second order are developed for power consumption and surface roughness. The adequacies of developed models are compared and the well suited full second-order RS model for power consumption and surface roughness is selected and validated

Keywords


CNC turning, Taguchi method, Response Surface Methodology (RSM), power consumption, surface roughness, Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Full Text:

PDF

References


G. Boothroyd, W. A. Knight, Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, Marcel- Dekker, New York; 1989.

M. C. Shaw, Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, New York; 1984.

P.G. Benardos, G.C.Vosniakos, Predicting Surface Roughness in Machining: A Review, International Journal of Machine Tool and Manufacturing 2003; 43: 833– 844p.

I.P. Arbizu, C.J.L. Perez, Surface Roughness Prediction by Factorial Design of Experiments in Turning Processes, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2003; 145...143-144: 390– 396p.

M.P. Groover, Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing—Materials Processing and Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 85–96p, 1996.

J. Kopac, S. Sali, Tool Wear Monitoring during the Turning Process, Journal of

Materials Processing Technology 2001; 113: 312–316p.

M.A. Xavior, M. Adithan, Determining the Influence of Cutting Fluids on Tool Wear and Surface Roughness during Turning

of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2009; 209: 900–909p.

K. Ihsan, K. Mustafa, C. Ibrahim, S. Ulvi, Determination of Optimum Cutting Parameters during Machining of AISI 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel, Materials and Design 2004; 25: 303–305p.

M. Nalbant, H. Gokkaya, G. Sur, Application of Taguchi Method in the Optimization of Cutting Parameters for Surface Roughness in Turning, Materials and Design 2007; 28:1379–1385p.

D.I. Lalwani, N.K. Mehta, P.K. Jain, Experimental Investigations of Cutting Parameters Influence on Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Finish Hard Turning of MDN250 Steel, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2008; 206: 167– 179p.

D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th Ed. New York: Wiley, 1997.

M.S.Chua, M. Rahman, Y.S. Wong, H.T. Loh, Determination of Optimal Cutting Conditions using Design of Experiments and Optimization Techniques,

International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacturing 1993; 33: 297–305p.

R.A. Fisher, Statistical Method for Research Worker, Oliver & Boyd, London; 1925.

I.A. Choudhury, M. A. El -Baradie, Machinability Assessment of Inconel 718 by Factorial Design of Experiment Coupled with Response Surface Methodology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 1999; 95: 30–39p.

Y. Sahin, A.R. Motorcu, Surface Roughness Model in Machining Hardened Steel with Cubic Boron Nitride Cutting Tool, International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 2008; 26: 84– 90p.

Y. Sahin, A.R. Motorcu, Surface Roughness Model for Machining Mild Steel with Coated Carbide Tool, Materials and Design 2005; 26: 321–326p.

D. Singh, P.V. Rao, A Surface Roughness Prediction Model for Hard Turning Process, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 2007; 32: 1115–1124p




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joprm.v3i1.7140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.