Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

QFD Methodology Application to Vocational Training Centres: A Case Study

Atishey Mittal, Sayed Aliul Hasan Rizvi, Pukhraj Sharma

Abstract


The main population of the stakeholders comprised of students, faculty members, industry people, alumni, parents and members of the society. Based on the data collected from stakeholders needs and expectations of the specific customers for vocational training were assessed and finally the customer’s needs were prioritized and analyzed through QFD technique. For the statistical data analysis, the study used the SPSS software package. The results of the study showed that the QFD technique can be used to develop better understanding of the needs in order to improve, not only all levels of higher educational activities, but also all similar levels of vocational education and training activities. This would help the educational planners and administrators in redesigning the education and training system from program design, to curriculum, to the satisfaction of students. Result of the present study indicated most important needs as Training of faculty in industry, Adequate machinery and tools, No administrative work to teachers, Industry sponsored training to students, and Regular craft instructors with the top ranking needs and least important needs as Up gradation of instructors with increased qualifications, online admissions and Increased pay scales for instructors. Statistical analysis based on t-test (paired) was employed to understand statistically significant difference in opinions of different stakeholders. In majority of the needs, the stakeholders were all emerge to have same opinions. These results have been discussed and final conclusions based on these results were drawn. Finally scope for future work is presented. It is observed that there are two potential beneficiaries of the present study, including permission granting and recognizing agencies of vocational education and vocational education stakeholders. The present study can support ITI management in analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, and also help in identifying the opportunities and threats against the competing systems.


Keywords


Quality function deployment, voice of the customer, vocational education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adhaye A. Overview of QFD: A Concept and Implementation. International Journal of Engineering Research &Technology (IJERT). 2013; 2(9): 671–676p.

Akao Yoji, Ohfuji Tadashi, Naoi Tomoyoshi. Survey and Reviews on Quality Function Deployment in Japan. Proceedings of the International Conference for Quality Control –1987, Tokyo: JUSE and IAQ. 1987; 171–176p.

Akao Y. Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design. Journal of Productivity Press. Cambridge, MA. 1990.

Akao Y. QFD: Past, Present, and Future, Proceedings of the International Symposium on QFD, Linkping. 1997.

All India Council for Technical Education, India http://www.aicte.ernet.in.

Allahham Jannat . Vocational Educational Facility Design: A Fuzzy QFD Approach. Islamic University of Gaza, Higher Education Deanship, Faculty of Engineering, Civil Engineering, Construction Management Program. 2010.

American Supplier Institute Inc. Quality Function Deployment. Executive Briefing, 1987, USA.

Aytac A, Deniz V. ,Quality Function Deployment in Education: A Curriculum Review. Quality and Quantity. 2005; 39: 507–14p.

Besterfield DH, Besterfield C, Besterfield GH, Besterfield M. Total Quality Management.

Bouchereau V, Rowlands H. Methods and Techniques to Help Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Benchmarking: An International Journal. 2000; 7(1): 8–19p.

Brochado A. Comparing Alternative Instruments to Measure Service Quality in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education. 2009; 17 (2): 174–90p.

Chan L, Ming-Lu W. Quality Function Deployment: A Literature Review. Eur. J. Operational Res. 2002; 143: 463–497p.

Chen LH, Weng MC. An Evaluation Approach to Engineering Design in QFD Processes using Fuzzy Goal Programming Models. European Journal of Operational Research. 2006; 172: 230–248p.

Chou SM. Evaluating the Service Quality of Undergraduate Nursing Education in Taiwan – Using Quality Function Deployment. Nurse Education Today. 2005; 24: 310–318p.

Coate LE. TQM at Oregon State University. J. Quality and Participation. 1990; a (12): 90–101p.

Rizvi, SAH. Course notes on Total Quality Management by Prof. Sayed Aliul Hasan Rizvi, Ph D, Group home page: http:// groups. yahoo.com/group/ TQM1AFU; Group email: [email protected]. 2014




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joprm.v5i2.7184

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.