Building Behaviour on Sloping Ground With & Without Diaphragm: Earthquake Zone-IV
Abstract
The period 1996 to 2015, 7,056 disasters recorded worldwide. 1.35 million People killed by natural hazards over the past 20 years, more than half died in earthquakes. The poorest nations paid the highest price in terms of the numbers killed per disaster and per 1,300,000 populations. Earthquake load is major effect on buildings especially on sloping grounds. Earthquake zone-IV is twice times more dangerous compare with zone-III. In the present study, G+12 storey & (30m x 30m) size of RC symmetrical building analyzed on varying slope angles i.e. 50, 100 & 150 with and without the earthquake loads as well as Diaphragms. Floor to floor height and bays size was considered 3m & (6 x 6) m respectively. IS:1893‐2002 used for calculation of earthquake forces & STAAD.Pro software used for the earthquake analysis of structures. Models without earthquake loads & diaphragm systems compared with earthquake loads as well as diaphragm systems on the sloping ground. Buildings subjected to earthquake loads are more critical on the sloping ground compare with flat ground because of torsional effects. Diaphragm systems minimized those effects. Structure forces, moments & deflections minimized when using Diaphragm system in zone-IV. Torsional forces are very minor in all members in all types of models.
Keywords: Sloping Ground, Earthquake Loads, RC Building, Diaphragm, Horizontal Bracing.
References
UNISDR: The United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (1996-2015).
IS: 875 (Part3): 2005: Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other than Earthquake) for Buildings & Structures, Part 3- Wind Loads.
B.G. Birajdar, S.S. Nalawade.Seismic analysis of buildings resting on sloping ground.13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver. B.C. Canada; August 1-6 2004, Paper No. 1472.
Y. Singh, Phani Gade, D.H. Lang & E. Erduran. Seismic Behavior of Buildings Located on Slopes - An Analytical Study and Some Observations. Sikkim Earthquake of September 18, 2011.
Kavita K. Pathak, Vijay H. Nimbhore, U. S. Salunkhe, U. B. Kalwane. Literature Review on Earthquake Analysis of Building Resting on Sloping Ground. International Journal of Structural Engineering & analysis, Vol. 4, Issue 2; 2018, pp 7-15.
Ajay Kumar Sreerama, Pradeep Kumar Ramancharla. Earthquake behavior of reinforced concrete framed buildings on hill Slopes. International Symposium on New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia (USMCA 2013); Oct 2013, pp 50-58.
Manish D. Meshram, Ashok R. Mundhada. Earthquake Analysis of RCC Buildings on Hilly Terrain: A review. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering & Technology. Vol. 1, Dec 2015, pp 255-261.
D. J. Misal, M. A. Bagade. Study of Earthquake Behaviour of Multi-Storied R.C.C. Buildings Resting on Sloping Ground & Considering Bracing System. International Journal of Engineering Research. Vol.5 Issue: Special 3, pp: 690-697.
Sujit Kumar, Vivek Garg, Abhay Sharma. Effect of sloping ground on structural performance of RCC building under seismic load. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology. vol. 2, issue 6, Aug. 2014 (ver II); ISSN: 2348-4098, pp 1310-1321.
Manjunath C S, Siddu Karthik C S. Seismic performance of RC buildings on sloping grounds with different types of bracing systems. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology. eISSN: 2319-1163, pISSN: 2321-7308, Vol. 05, Issue 02,| Feb 2016, pp 82-90.
K. K. Pathak, U. S. Salunkhe, Comparison between with & without horizontal bracing on sloping ground: Earthquake zone-III, International journal of structural engineering, vol.6, Issue 1, 2020, pp 1-10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |