Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Seismic Analysis of G+10 Building With and Without Zipper Brace Frame

Swapnil Suresh Maindre, S.B. Salve

Abstract


This paper presents a seismic analysis of a G+10 building with and without Zipper Brace Frame (ZBF). The research begins with a detailed literature review, investigating the existing seismic-resistant techniques employed in high-rise buildings. The Zipper Brace Frame is introduced as an innovative system that has shown promising results in enhancing seismic performance while maintaining architectural aesthetics. Two analytical models are created: one without bracing systems and the other incorporating the Zipper Brace Frame. The seismic analysis is performed using E-tab software capable of simulating dynamic response under different seismic excitations. The seismic performance evaluation includes several key aspects: story drifts, lateral displacements and base shear. The results of the seismic analysis are thoroughly compared and discussed to identify the structural behaviour differences between the without zipper bracing system and the ZBF. Emphasis is placed on the performance of the ZBF in minimizing inter-story drifts, reducing floor accelerations, and enhancing overall building stability during seismic events. Through this comparative study, the seismic effectiveness of the Zipper Brace Frame is validated, and its potential advantages over conventional lateral bracing systems are highlighted. The findings of this research contribute to the knowledge of seismic-resistant technologies and can aid structural engineers and designers in making informed decisions for designing safer and more resilient high-rise buildings in seismic-prone regions.

Keywords


Zipper brace frame, high rise building, seismic analysis, lateral displacement, storey drift, base shear, E-tab Software, Is 1893-2016.

Full Text:

PDF

References


M.Schachter et al., 2007, “Analytical Modeling of Zipper Frames Subjected To Shaking Table

Testing”.

Chuang-Sheng Yang et al., 2008, “Pushover Response of a Braced Frame With Suspended Zipper

Struts”.

A Kadid et al., 2011, “Seismic Assessment of Braced RC Frames”.

K.K. Sangle et al., 2012, “Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Steel Frame with and Without Bracing”.

S. Naeimi et al., 2012, “Study of the Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames”.

Nasim Irani Sarand et al., 2013, “Seismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames; A Review”.

Peter Cada et al., 2017, “Comparison of Methods Used For Seismic Analysis of Structures”.

Eraboina Lalitha et al., 2017, “Seismic Analysis and Design of Residential Building”.

S.P. Shejul et al., 2018, “A Review on Seismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames”.

Yasaman Balazadeh-Minouei et al., 2018, “Seismic Retrofit of an Existing 10-Story ChevronBraced Steel-Frame”.

Jaimin Kamal Shah et al., 2018, “Seismic Performance of Zipper Braced Frame Designed by

Performance Based Plastic Design method and Force Based Design Method”.

Kaveh Nezamisavojbolaghi et al., 2019, “Using Concentric and Zipper Steel Braces by Comparison

of Effect on Improved Seismic Performance Level of Concrete Moment Frame Structures with

Moderate Ductility”.

Nasim Irani Sarand et al., 2021, “Seismic Response Investigation of Rocking ZipperBraced Frames

Under Near-Fault Ground Motions”.

Fereshtech Emami et al., 2021, “Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Chevron and SuspendedZipper Braced Frames Under Near-Fault Ground Motion”.

Jeet Kumar Sonwani et al., 2021, “Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Braced Frames Under

Near-Fault

Illustrated Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (Dr. S. R. Karve) Eighth Edition, 2017.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.