Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM
<p><strong>Journal of Structural Engineering and Management (JoSEM)</strong> This a global Journal publishing all aspects of structural Engineering and Management. The goal of this Journal is to provide a platform for scientists, academicians and Engineers to discuss the new developments in the area of Structural engineering.<span>It's a triannual journal, started in 2014.</span></p><p><strong>eISSN:<span>2393-8773</span></strong></p><p><strong><span>Journal DOI no:<strong>10.37591/<strong>JoSEM</strong></strong></span></strong></p><p><strong><strong>Scientific Journal Impact Factor : </strong>6.046</strong></p><p><strong>Indexed in :DRJI, SJIF, Journal TOC, Google Scholar,Cite factor, Index Copernicus<a href="https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/details?id=124953">(ICV:54.27)</a></strong></p><p><strong><strong>Readership:</strong> <strong>Graduates, Postgraduates, Research Scholars, Faculty</strong></strong></p><p><strong><strong><br /></strong></strong></p><p><strong>Focus and Scope Covers</strong></p><ul><li>Vibration Impact, Structural Dynamics</li><li>Experimental Mechanics</li><li>Structural Engineering and Structural Mechanics</li><li>Analytical and design Methods</li><li>Bridge , Dam construction and analysis</li><li>Repairs, Strengthening, Maintenance</li><li>Innovative Structures</li><li>Testing Technologies</li></ul><div><strong>Submission of Paper:</strong> </div><div><p>All contributions to the journal are rigorously refereed and are selected on the basis of quality and originality of the work. The journal publishes the most significant new research papers or any other original contribution in the form of reviews and reports on new concepts in all areas pertaining to its scope and research being done in the world, thus ensuring its scientific priority and significance. Manuscripts are invited from academicians, students, research scholars and faculties for publication consideration.<br />Papers are accepted for editorial consideration through mail <a href="mailto:info@journalspub.com" target="_blank">info@stmjournals.com</a>, <a href="mailto:priyanka.gautam@celnet.in" target="_blank">susmita@celnet.in</a></p><p><strong>Subject</strong>: Civil Engineering</p><p><strong>Plagiarism</strong>: All the articles will be check through <strong>Plagiarism Software </strong>before publication. </p><p><strong>Abbreviation</strong>: <strong>JoSEM</strong></p><p><strong>Frequency</strong>: Three issues per year</p><p><strong><a href="/index.php/TMET/about/editorialPolicies#peerReviewProcess" target="_blank">Peer Reviewed Policy</a></strong></p></div><p><strong><a href="/index.php/JoSEM/about/editorialTeam">EDITORIAL BOARD</a></strong></p><div id="journalDescription"><p><strong><a href="http://stmjournals.com/pdf/Author-Guidelines-stmjournals.pdf" target="_blank">Instructions to Authors</a></strong></p><div><strong> </strong></div></div><p><strong><br /></strong></p><p> <img src="/public/site/images/engg_manager/88.jpg" alt="" /></p>en-USJournal of Structural Engineering and Management2393-8773<p align="center"><strong>Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form</strong></p><p align="center">(to be completed by authors)</p><p>I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is <strong>not</strong> under consideration of publication elsewhere.</p><ul><li>I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.</li><li>I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).</li><li>I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.</li><li> I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:</li></ul><p>Author’s name </p><p> </p><p>1. ________________</p><p>2. ________________</p><p>3. ________________</p><p>4. ________________</p><table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="5%"><p align="center"> </p></td><td valign="top" width="95%"><p>We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>Comprehensive Seismic Evaluation of Underground Water Tanks with Focus on Fill Conditions: An In-Depth STAAD.Pro Analysis
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7495
<p>The seismic analysis of underground water tanks is crucial for ensuring their structural<br />integrity and performance during seismic events. This review paper focuses on the seismic<br />analysis of underground water tanks considering different fill conditions, utilizing the<br />STAAD.Pro software for analysis purposes. The significance of seismic analysis in underground<br />water tanks and highlights the importance of considering fill conditions during the analysis.<br />Various fill conditions, such as empty, partially filled, and fully filled tanks, are investigated to<br />understand their impact on the structural behavior of the tanks. The paper reviews and<br />synthesizes existing literature on seismic analysis methodologies applied to underground water<br />tanks. It covers analytical and numerical approaches employed in previous studies, including<br />response spectrum analysis and time history analysis, to evaluate the seismic response of these<br />structures. Moreover, the abstract presents the key factors influencing the seismic behavior of<br />underground water tanks, such as tank geometry, soil-structure interaction, and seismic loading<br />characteristics. The effects of different types of backfill materials and their compaction levels on<br />the tank&#39;s seismic performance are also discussed. The review paper presents the findings and<br />observations from various studies, providing insights into the behavior and performance of<br />underground water tanks under different seismic conditions. These insights contribute to<br />improving the design and retrofitting strategies for underground water tanks, enhancing their<br />resilience to seismic activities. Overall, this review paper offers a comprehensive analysis of the<br />seismic behavior of underground water tanks considering fill conditions.</p>Harshad NahladeSanjeev Kumar Verma
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-12-072023-12-071032026Comparison of Conventional RCC Columns, Steel Columns and Composite Columns
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7534
Worldwide, the steel industry is expanding almost everywhere. Compared to the USA, EU, and other developed nations, India uses less steel in the construction industry. Additionally, India's cities have some of the highest population densities per square kilometre, which limits horizontal construction growth and favours vertical development. Steel structures are more ductility and can undergo more deflections while concrete structures are larger and attracts more seismic weight. Hybrid construction combines the advantageous characteristics of both the concrete and steel materials. With the aid of the ETAB programme, the static analysis and Response spectrum technique required by IS1893:2002 are carried out for three-dimensional models of the RCC column structure, steel column structure, and composite column structure. Comparative study of RCC column structure, steel column structure and composite column structure for G+10 is included. Furthermore, the paper addresses the economic implications of these structural systems. It compares the initial costs. Overall, the comparative analysis aims to provide engineers, architects, and construction professionals with valuable insights into the selection of the most suitable structural system for a given project. It helps in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of RCC column structures, steel structures, and composite structures, enabling informed decision-making based on project requirements, budget constraints, and performance expectations.Parameshwar HiremathAdil Hussain Tantray
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-11-232023-11-23103354410.37591/josem.v10i3.7534Seismic Analysis of G+10 Building With and Without Zipper Brace Frame
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7544
This paper presents a seismic analysis of a G+10 building with and without Zipper Brace Frame (ZBF). The research begins with a detailed literature review, investigating the existing seismic-resistant techniques employed in high-rise buildings. The Zipper Brace Frame is introduced as an innovative system that has shown promising results in enhancing seismic performance while maintaining architectural aesthetics. Two analytical models are created: one without bracing systems and the other incorporating the Zipper Brace Frame. The seismic analysis is performed using E-tab software capable of simulating dynamic response under different seismic excitations. The seismic performance evaluation includes several key aspects: story drifts, lateral displacements and base shear. The results of the seismic analysis are thoroughly compared and discussed to identify the structural behaviour differences between the without zipper bracing system and the ZBF. Emphasis is placed on the performance of the ZBF in minimizing inter-story drifts, reducing floor accelerations, and enhancing overall building stability during seismic events. Through this comparative study, the seismic effectiveness of the Zipper Brace Frame is validated, and its potential advantages over conventional lateral bracing systems are highlighted. The findings of this research contribute to the knowledge of seismic-resistant technologies and can aid structural engineers and designers in making informed decisions for designing safer and more resilient high-rise buildings in seismic-prone regions.Swapnil Suresh MaindreS.B. Salve
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-11-232023-11-231032734Seismic Control System for Vertically Irregular Buildings
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7367
<p>Behavior of High rise building mainly depends on their structural planning. In this present study, a G+20 storey RCC building having vertical setback irregularity above tenth storey is considered. Due to such irregular configuration building becomes more vulnerable to seismic vibration. To control these vibration stiffeners are used at suitable positions, by going through trial and error method. The parameters considered for comparison are fundamental time period, storey displacement and storey drift. The analysis is carried by response spectrum method. It can be seen that adding the steel bracing at effective location reduces story displacement, story drift, torsional displacement and it also helps in shifting the torsional mode from first mode to third mode. The steel bracings are also be effectively used as retrofitting in vertically irregular building by positioning suitably at the required bays of the building.</p><p>Keywords: Vertically irregular building, torsional response, response spectrum method, bracing</p>Shaikh ShujahtSatish Deshmukh
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-10-102023-10-10103111Comparative Study of RC Elevated Water Tank
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7368
Designing a water tank requires a good approximation of water demands which is depends on the estimation of population growth rate and design life of the tank and the per capita water consumption rate. Due to rapid increase in urbanization, development activities and enormous need by the public the rate of water consumption increasing day by day. It would difficult task to supply the water directly from the source, it should be stored and treated. In this paper we are analyzing the elevated circular and intze water tank by using Staad Pro. After conducting a manual analysis and design of water parameters, the findings extracted from all the final graphs lead us to the conclusion that, in comparison to elevated circular water tanks, elevated Intze water tanks exhibit lower moment values. This observation indicates that the elevated Intze water tank design is more economical and potentially offers cost savings.Sanket Kiranrao DokeS.B. Deshmukh
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-09-272023-09-27103121910.37591/josem.v10i3.7368Seismic Performance of Mono-Support Building Equipped with Exoskeletons
https://engineeringjournals.stmjournals.in/index.php/JoSEM/article/view/7361
Seismic performance of the structure is one of the most crucial and important aspect of structural engineering. There have been many developments in the field of seismic resistance to enhance the behavior of the structures during seismically activated conditions. In this study the Seismic performance of buildings standing on singular columns have been studied. To enhance the dynamic behavior of the structures analyzed, the buildings were additionally equipped with steel exoskeletons, HDRB and LRB dampers so as to control the seismic excitations and improvise the response of the buildings to a considerable extent.Aadil KotkarR.S. Londhe
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Structural Engineering and Management
2023-09-182023-09-181031322