Prediction of Mix Ratios for Grade 30 Superplasticized Concrete Using Osadebe’s Regression Model
Abstract
This study developed a model for estimating the compressive strength of grade 30 super-plasticized concrete. The regression model was built using a total of 15 experimental mix ratios. The results of compressive strength at 28 days from the concrete cubes were used for model development. Two cubes (150 mm × 150 mm × 150 mm) were produced per mix ratio, totaling 30 cubes for the 15 trial mix ratios. Osadebe’s regression model was used to model this work. For model validation, a total of 15 mix ratios were used as control points. Two cubes were also made per mix ratio. The constructed regression model was assessed for adequacy using the F-statistics at a 95% level of confidence and was found to be adequate. After 28 days of curing in water, the maximum compressive strength of 41.93 N/mm2 was achieved; this is higher than the intended mean strength of 38.25 N/mm2 . The mix ratio was 0.31:0.85:0.15:1.353:2.987 (fluid/binder:cement:sawdust ash:sand:granite). The produced superplasticized grade 30 concrete can be utilized to build reinforced concrete bridges, dams, retaining walls and other structures. A computer program was developed using Visual Basic software to aid in the mix ratio prediction process and vice versa.
Keywords: Compressive strength, concrete cubes, mix ratios, Osadebe’s regression model, super plasticized concrete
References
Akalin O, Akay KU, Sennaroglu B, Tez M. Optimization of chemical admixture for concrete on
mortar performance tests using mixture experiments. Chemometrics Intell Labor Syst. 2010; 104
(2): 233–242.
Anyaogu L, Chijioke C, Okoye P. Prediction of compressive strength of PFA-cement concrete.
IOSR J Mech Civil Eng. 2013; 6 (1): 1–9.
British Standards Institution. BS EN 1008. Mixing Water for Concrete – Specification for sampling,
testing and assessing the suitability of water, including water recovered from processes in the
concrete industry, as mixing water for concrete. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 2002.
British Standards Institution. BS EN 812-103.1. Testing Aggregates. Methods of Determination of
Particle Size Distribution Sieve Tests. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 2000.
British Standards Institution. BS 882 (1978): Specification for Aggregates from Natural Sources
for Concrete. London, UK: British Standards Institution; 1978.
Ezeh JC, Ibearugbulem OM. Application of Scheffe’s model in optimization of compressive cube
strength of river stone aggregate concrete. Int J Nat Appl Sci. 2009; 5 (4): 303–308.
Ezeh JC, Ibearugbulem OM. Optimization of compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete
using Scheffe’s second degree simplex model. Int J Appl Eng. 2010; 5 (10): 1757–1764.
Khamput P. A study of compressive strength of concrete using quarry dust to replace sand. In:
Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Development Conference, Khon Kaen University,
Khon Kaen, Thailand, 2006. Pp. 108–110.
Neville AM, Brooks JJ. Concrete Technology. New Delhi, India: Pearson Education; 1987.
Onwuka DO, Okere CE, Arimanwa JI, Onwuka SU. Prediction of concrete mix ratios using
modified regression theory. Comput Methods Civil Eng. 2011; 2 (1): 95–107.
Osadebe NN. Generalized mathematical modeling of compressive strength of normal concrete as a
multi-variant function of the properties of its constituent components. Paper delivered at the College
of Engineering, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 2003.
Osadebe NN, Ibearugbulem OM. Application of Scheffe’s simplex model in optimizing compressive
strength of periwinkle shell-granite concrete. The Heartland Eng. 2009; 4 (1) pp. 27–38.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |