Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Modulation in CRI Due to Solar-Interplanetary Causes during 1996–2018

B.R. Ghormare, B.R. Ghormare

Abstract


Abstract

Solar outputs and their variations are responsible to produce modulation in cosmic ray intensity (CRI) both on short-term as well as on long–term basis. It is seen that sunspot number; 10.7 cm sun oriented radio transition, coronal mass launches (CMEs) and sunlight based flares are the causal connect to sun oriented movement (SA). In addition, coronal mass discharges are related with an assortment of interplanetary plasma and field aggravations. In view of the perception from Omniweb server farm for sun powered interplanetary information movement and month to month mean tally pace of enormous beam force (CRI) variety information from neutron screens (Moscow, Oulu,) during the time of 1996–2018. We observed a record high value of cosmic ray intensity with low values of solar interplanetary activity parameters during minimum of solar cycle 23/24. Statistical techniques are used to correlate data of solar interplanetary and count rate of cosmic ray intensity i.e. better anti-correlated with solar activity parameters.

Keywords: Galactic cosmic ray (GCR), Coronal mass ejections (CMEs), solar Activity (SA) Solar Magnetic Field, Heliospheric Magnetic Field (HMF)

Cite this Article

B.K. Tiwari, B.R. Ghormare. Modulation in CRI Due to Solar-Interplanetary Causes during 1996-2018. Recent Trends in Electronics and Communication Systems. 2020; 7 (1): 21–25p.



Full Text:

PDF

References


Forbush. On the Effects in Cosmic-Ray Intensity Observed During the Recent Magnetic Storm. Physics Rev. 1937; 51: 1108–1109.

Rybak J, Antalova A, Storini M. The wavelet analysis of the solar and cosmic ray data. Space Sci. Rev. 2001; 97: 359–362.

Modzelewska. R, Alania MV. The27-Days Cosmic Ray Intensity Variation During Solar Minimum 23 and 24. Solar Phys, 2013; 286: 593–607.

Tiwari BK, Ghormare BR, Shrivastava PK, DP Tiwari. Modulation in Cosmic ray During the Declining and Minimum Solar Activity Period of Solar Cycle 23. Res. J. Physical Sci. 2014; 2(2): 9–12.

Zhao L, Fisk L. Understand the behavior of the heliospheric magnetic field and the solar wind during the unusual solar minimum between cycle 23 and 24. Solar Phys. 2011; 274, 379.

Tiwari BK. Ghormare BR, Shrivastava PK, Tiwari DP. Dependence of the Heliosphere and Cosmic ray (CR) Modulation on Solar activity. Res. J. Physical Sci. 2014; 2(5), 8–11.

Jokai JR, Levy EH, Hubbard WB. Effect of particle drift on cosmic –ray transport. Astro Phys. J. 1977; 213:861–868.

Tiwari BK. Ghormare BR. Variation in GCRs with solar variability between 1996 to 2018.IJCEP. 2018; 4(2): 43–46.

Chowdhury P, K Kudela, BN Dwivedi Heliospheric Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays During Solar Cycle 23, Solar Physics, 2013; 286(2): 577–591.

Dikpati M. Comparison of the Past Two Solar Minima from the Perspective of the Interior Dynamics and Dynamo of the Sun, Space Sci Rev., DOI 10.1007/s11214–011–9790-z, 2013; 176(1–4): 279–287.

Dorman LI, Cosmic rays variations and space exploration, Nauka, Moscow (1963)

Jokipii JR, Kopriva DA. (1979), Effects of particle drift on the transport of cosmic rays. III-Numerical models of galactic cosmic-ray modulation, Astrophys. J. 234: 384–392.

Schwadron NA, Boyd AJ, Kozarev K, Golightly M, Spence H, Townsend LW, Owens M. Galactic cosmic ray radiation hazard in the unusual extended solar minimum between solar cycles 23 and 24, Space Weather, 2010; 8, A6, S00E04

Potgieter MS. Modulation of galactic protons in the heliosphere during the unusual solar minimum of 2006 to 2009. Sol. Phys. 2014; 289: 391–406.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/rtecs.v7i1.3831

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Recent Trends in Electronics and Communication Systems