Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Reducing the Uncertainty of Marine Accidents Failure Rate in Harsh Environment; Using Bayesian Theory

Reza Gholamnia, Ahmad Bahoo Toroody, Saeed Amirahmadi, Farshad Bahoo Toroody

Abstract


The interest in arctic activities is strong, but has not led to significant quantifying analysis over the fact of finding rescannable failure rate. To attract investors and promote the development of a marine industry, a clear concept of project risk is paramount; in particular, issues relating to human role in operation are critical. In the public domain, reliability of information is often scarce or inappropriate for such environment. Also, an interdisciplinary study is needed to couple human error probability to operational accidents and failures to work out plausible failure rate. Thus, reliability estimates are fraught with large uncertainties. This paper explores sources and magnitudes of failure rate uncertainty and demonstrates the effect on reliability estimates for lifting operation in cold environment. If generic failure rate data forms the basis of a reliability assessment, reliability estimates are not robust and may significantly over- or underestimate system reliability. The Bayesian statistical framework provides a method to overcome this issue. Generic data can be updated with more specific information that could not be statistically incorporated otherwise. To reduce uncertainty on failure rate, a new methodology is adopted to consider human error probability to find operation accident failure rate. It is proposed that adopting such an approach at an early stage in an iterative process will lead to an improved rate of certainty.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Faisal Khan, SA. Safety Challenges in Harsh Environments: Lessons Learned. Process Safety Progress. 2015; 191–195p.

Thies Philipp R, GH. Addressing Failure Rate Uncertainties of Marine Energy Converters. Renewable Enegry. 2012; 359–367p.

DECC. Marine Energy Action Plan: Executive and Summary & Recommendations. HM Goverment; 2010.

Swain AG. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphsis on Nuclear Power. Washington: US Nuclear Regulatory; 1983.

Oberkampf WL, HJ. Challenge Problems: Uncertainty in System Response Given Uncertain Parameters. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 2004; 85: 9–11p.

Thies PR, FJ. Is it a Show Stopper? Reliability Assessment and Criticality Analysis for Wave Energy Converters. In: 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference (EWTEC), Uppsala, Sweden. 7–10 Sep 2009.

Ross S. A First Course in Probability. 8th Edn. NJ: Pearson; 2010.

Embrey DH. SLIM-MAUD: An Approach to Assessing Human Error Probabilities Using Structured Expert Judgement. Washington DC: NUREG/CR-3518, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1984.

Neapolitan RE. Learning Bayesian Networks. Chicago, Illinois: Northeastern Illinois University; 2004.

Tung-Tsan Chen, S-SL. Fall Risk Assessment of Cantilever Bridge Projects Using Bayesian Network. Safety Science. 2014; 161–171p.

Aliyu Mohammed, HA. Malware Risk Analysis on the Campus Network with Bayesian Belief Network. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications (IJNSA). Jul 2013; 5(4).

Blackman HG. Human Error Quantification Using Performance Shaping Factors in the SPAR-H Method. 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 2008.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3759/joise.v3i2.3522

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.