CBR Characteristics of Layered Black Cotton Soil Stabilized with Red Stone Dust and Geosynthetics

Authors

  • Kiran Bhoot
  • Divya Prakash

Keywords:

Black Cotton Soils, California Bearing Ratio, Geogrid, Geotextile, Red Stone Dust

Abstract

Geosynthetic materials play a pivotal role in addressing the challenges associated with black cotton soil, a problematic soil type prone to volume changes and exhibiting high plasticity. The primary objective is to enhance the strength properties of black cotton soil through a two-step process. Initially, the soil is stabilized by incorporating varying percentages (5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, and 35%) of red stone dust waste. Subsequently, to prepare the stabilized soil for use as a subgrade, geosynthetics are employed for reinforcement, with placement at different depths in both single and double layers. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests serve as a key assessment tool for the blends of Black Cotton Soil (BCS) and Red Stone Dust (RSD) with geotextile and geogrid reinforcement. The geosynthetic materials are strategically placed at depths of H/3 and 2H/3 from the top of the loading surface. Among the tested blends, those containing 25% RSD exhibit the most promising results in terms of CBR improvement. Moreover, the study reveals that the incorporation of additional reinforcement in a single layer yields more substantial enhancements in CBR values compared to the double-layer reinforcement approach. Specifically, the findings highlight that a single layer of geogrid, positioned at H/3 depth, outperforms geotextile in a single layer. This research contributes valuable insights into optimizing the stabilization and reinforcement of black cotton soil using a combination of red stone dust waste and geosynthetic materials, offering a comprehensive understanding of the interplay between various parameters for effective soil engineering solutions.

References

Ogundare DA, Familusi AO, Osunkunle AB, Olusami JO. Utilization of Geotextile for Soil Stabilization. Afr J Eng Res. 2018;7(8):224-31.

Zumrawi MM. Construction Problems of Light Structures Founded on Expansive Soils in Sudan. Int J Sci Res. 2015;4(8):896-902.

Zornberg JG. Functions and applications of geosynthetics in roadways. Trans Geotech Geoenviron. 2017;189:298-306.

Dixit M, Patil K. Utilization of stone dust to improve the properties of expansive soil. Int J Civil Eng Technol. 2016;7:440-7.

Fazl-A-Zalal, Khan Shahzada, Salman Saeed et al. Stabilization of Medium Expansive Soils in Pakistan Using Marble Industrial Waste and Bagasse Ash. Int J Environ Sci Eng. 2017;10:885-91.

Bui D, Onyelowe K. Adsorbed complex and laboratory geotechnics of Quarry Dust (QD) stabilized lateritic soils. Environ Technol Innov. 2018;103:55–63.

Pupalwad AS, Padmavathi M, et al. An Experimental Study on CBR of Expansive Soil Subgrades using Geotextiles. Int J Civil Struct Eng Res. 2019;7(1):119-28.

Chakraborty M, Kumar J. Bearing capacity of circular foundations reinforced with geogrid sheets. Geotext Geomembr. 2014;54(4):820–32.

Reddy CNVS. Reinforced Flexible Pavement Design over Expansive Subgrades. In: Symposium on Engineering of Ground & Environmental Geotechnics (seg2); 2008 Feb. 29 – March 1; Hyderabad, India; p. 186-91.

Srivastava R, Shukla S, Tiwari RP, Mittal A. Effect of Woven Polyester Geotextile on the Strength of Black Cotton Soil. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2016;5(7):12402-8.

Patil A. Effects of polyester geotextiles on CBR of road sub-base. ISDE. 2011;2(4):99-102.

Published

2024-02-06

Issue

Section

Research Articles