Study Analysis of Decisive Cost and Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/joprm.v9i2.2772Keywords:
Prevention-Appraisal-Failure, Analytical hieratical process (AHP), SWOT Analysis, Decision ParametersAbstract
In this article, we discuss the beneficial level of a machine according to its features. Here, two methodologies are used to take decision according to some internal features and external aspects. First use analytical hierarchy process method for survey. Generally, parameters generated by analytical hieratical process (AHP) is preferred by consumers. Nowadays quality is most preferable parameter (in cutting machine use 46% approximate). Second one is productivity (33% approximate); we can focus only on quantity concern where raw material is very cheap. Mostly people ignore machine cost issues in comparison to quality and productivity. In such cases the decision percentage is only 6% approximate in comparison to the machine cost. Second methodology utilizes comparison of both the formulation of machine cost and its quality. The decision of selection of machine depends on the parameter such as technical preferences and economic preferences. The quality and cost analysis help in making decision which is beneficial. Here, preference of Mechanical Cutting CNC Machine is 58% approximate in separate analysis and Laser Cutting CNC Machine is 77% approximate depending on the choice of benefits. Both methodologies examine and focus on market trend and implementation of easy methods of manufacturing to secure more demand and goodwill. Profit and loss are also factor of focus here to take decision.
References
M Ranjeet Singh Jadaun, Manish Kumar Sagar. Study Analysis of Decisive Cost and Quality. Journal of Production Research & Management. 2019; 9(2): 20–28p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |