Optimization of Process Parameters for Honing Procedure of GG25 Cylinder Liner by using Full Factorial Method

Authors

  • Vatsal K. Joshi
  • Hardik N. Chauhan
  • Akash R. Sadatiya
  • Jignasa B. Joshi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/joeam.v9i2.779

Keywords:

Cylinder liner, design of experiment, experimentation, honing machine, honing process, validation

Abstract

Modern processes have been taken part in the market and industries. Optimization is a major part of the industry and it is a big major challenge in the industry. The industry is keen to implement the optimization in each area of industry. Optimization provides accuracy and productivity for the product. Honing is known as super finishing manufacturing process. After boring, honing is carried out and it is the last operation of any component. Honing provides accomplished surface finishing in the cylinder liner. The main purpose of honing is to give prevention against the leakage of oil. RPM, Number of strokes, Expansion pressure are the input parameters and output parameter is Surface roughness. Parameters of honing process such as RPM, number of strokes, expansion pressure have been optimized. Then with the help of ANOVA no. of stroke is considered as a most influence input parameter. Different main effect graphs are considered for output parameter, surface roughness for different parameters of surface roughness such asRa and Rz and considering that no. of stroke is a most important input parameter. Then regression analysis gives practical validation when comparing to theoretical analysis and by doing this thing means (optimization), production rate is increased and productivity is increased. With the help of full factorial method practical test means experiments have been done. Then production rate and productivity have been increased.

Author Biography

Vatsal K. Joshi

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Atmiya Institute of Technology & Science,

Rajkot, Gujrat, India

 

References

Buj-Corral I, Rodero-De-Lamo L, Macro-Almagro L. Use of results from honing test machines to determine roughness in industrial honing machines. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 2017; 28(1): 60-69p.

Zahouani H, Mansori MEL. Multi-scale and multi-fractal analysis of abrasive wear signature of honing process. Wear. 2017; 376-377(A):178-177p.

Schmitt C, Bahre D. Analysis of the Process Dynamics for the Precision Honing of Bores. Procedia CIRP. 2014; 17: 692-697p.

Silva SPD, Filho SLMR, Brandao LC. Particle swarm optimization for achieving the minimum profile error in honing process. Precision Enginerring. 2014; 38: 759-768p.

Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Coba-Salcedo M. Modelling of surface finish and material removal rate in rough honing. Precision Engineering. 2014; 38: 100-108p.

Goeldel B, Mansori MEL, Dumur D. Macroscopic simulation of the liner honing process. Manufacturing Technology. 2012; 61: 319-322p.

Sabri L, Mezghani S, Mansori MEL, Zahouani H. Multi study of finish-honing process in mass production of cylinder liner. Wear. 2011; 271: 509-513p.

Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J. Roughness variability in the honing process of steel cylinders with CBN metal bonded tools. Precision Engineering. 2011; 35(2): 289-293p.

Pawlus P, Cieslak T, Mathia T. The study of cylinder liner plateau honing process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2009; 209: 6078-6086p.

Guo YB, Zhang Y, Zhong JA, Syoji K. Optimization of honing wheel structure parameters in ultra-precision plane honing. Journals of Materials Processing Technology. 2002; 129: 96-100p.

www.esteemauto.com

Downloads

Published

2018-08-16

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Research Article

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.