Comparing Consistency Limits of Black Cotton Soil with Cement Waste Dust and Wood Shaving Ash
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3759/joge.v4i1.3737Abstract
In the field of civil engineering, soil has to play a prime role right from planning a structure to the end of life of that structure. But some of the soils do not offer that service which a civil engineer wants to get. Shrinking in dry state and swelling in wet state, is the well-known proved proverb for black cotton soil. In Saurashtra, southern part of the zone has such soils with problem of volume change in absence and presence of water. In this research, an experimental study is carried out on black cotton soil of local area in Saurashtra (Gujarat) with cement waste dust and wood shaving ash. Consistency limits were studied with and without these two stabilizing materials. 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20% of mass of soil sample were considered for both the stabilizing materials in order to conclude the research study. Laboratory work was done in accordance with IS 2720 of geotechnical engineering. While comparing the stabilizing materials, cement waste dust shows parabolic change in the value of liquid limit from 59 to 39% and plastic limit from 34 to 27% with the crown value of 31 and 22% respectively. Hence, final reduction in plasticity index from 25 to 9%. On the contrary, wood shaving ash shows gradual increment (within experimental limitations), in the value of liquid limit from 59 to 73% and plastic limit from 34 to 55%, concluding with reduction in plasticity index from 25 to 18%. As far as comparison is concerned, cement waste dust is more suitable than wood shaving ash, as cement waste dust not only reduces the plasticity index (with respect to unstabilized soil), but also controls the liquid limit and plastic limit during the tests due to pozzolanic activity.
References
Pranshoo Solanki, Naji Khoury, Zaman MM. Engineering Properties and Moisture Susceptibility of Silty Clay Stabilized with Lime, Class C Fly Ash and Cement Kiln Dust. J Mater Civ Eng, ASCE. 2009; 749p.
Seco A, Ramierz F, Miqueleiz L, et al. Stabilization of Expansive Soils for Use in Construction. Appl Clay Sci. 2011; 51(03): 348–352p.
Oza JB, Gundaliya PJ. Study of Black Cotton Soil Characteristics with Cement Waste Dust and Lime. Elsevier, Science Direct. 2013; 51: 110–118p.
Rashmi Bade, Nuzra Zainab Khan, Jaya Sahare, et al. Effect of Wood Shaving Ash on Index Properties of Black Cotton Soil. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET). 2017; 04(02): 38–39p.
Indian Standard Code: IS 2720-1992 Part-18. Methods of Tests of Soils: Field Moisture Equivalent.
Indian Standard Code: IS 1892-1979. Code of Practice for Subsurface Investigations for Foundations (First Revision).
Indian Standard Code: IS 2720-1985 Part-5. Methods of Tests of Soils: Determination of Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit of Soils.
Indian Standard Code: IS 9259-2002. Specifications for Liquid Limit Apparatus for Soils.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |