Examination of Physicochemical Parameters of Crude Oil Remediation in Soil Environment using Agro-Based Material
Abstract
In this investigation the following physicochemical parameters were monitored which include cation exchange capacity, sodium ion, carbon, magnesium, nitrogen, calcium, available phosphorus, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature. The experimental result obtained reveals that the physicochemical parameters analyzed the reaction than the inhibiting the reaction process by inhibiting the active site of microorganisms present in each bioreactor. The research showcases, the mass and the volume of the materials used for the experimental set-up of each bioreactor for the study as 20kg of loamy soil, 100ml of crude oil and 30g to 150g of remediant. The agro-based remediants used for this investigation demonstrates that the physicochemical parameters monitored resulted to increase and decrease in the properties as well as enhance a positive performance of the process without the inhibition of bioremediation. The mass of the remediant dosage influence the characteristics of the physicochemical parameters monitored as well as favor the bioremediation process.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abed, R.M.; Al-Sabahi, J.; Al-Maqrashi, F.; Al-Habsi, A.; Al-Hinai, M. Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria isolated from oil-contaminated sediments in the sultanate of Oman and evaluation of bioaugmentation and biostimulation approaches in microcosm
experiments. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 89, 58–66.
Adams, G. O., Fufeyin, P. T., Okoro, S. E., & Ehinomen, I. (2015). Bioremediation, Biostimulation and Bioaugmention: A Review. International Journal of Environmental Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 3(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.12691/ijebb-3-1-5
Angelidaki I I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK (1999), A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas Biotechnology 63: 363–372.
Aspray T, Gluszek A, Carvalho D (2008) Effect of nitrogen amendment on respiration and respiratory quotient (RQ) in three hydrocarbon contaminated soils of different type. Chemosphere
:947–951.
Azubuike, C. C., Chikere, C. B., & Okpokwasili, G. C. (2016). Bioremediation techniques– classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects. World
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 32(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2137-x
Bagi, A. (2013). Effect of low temperature on hydrocarbon biodegradation in marine environments by. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/182629
Batstone DJ, Keller J, Angelidaki I, Kalyuzhnyi SV, Pavlostathis SG, (2002). The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). Water Science Technology 45: 65–73.
Bento FM, Camargo FAO, Okeke BC, Frankenberger WT (2005) Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation.
Bioresour Technol 96:1049–1055.
Brown RA, Crosbie JR (1994) Oxygen sources for in situ bioremediation. In: Flathman PE, Jerger DE, Jurgen HE (eds) Bioremediation: field experience. CRC, LLC Boca Raton, FL, pp 311–332.
Cerqueira, V.S.; Peralba, M.D.C.R.; Camargo, F.A.D.O.; Bento, F.M. Comparison of bioremediation strategies for soil impacted with petrochemical oily sludge. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 95, 338–345.
Chynoweth DP, Isaacson R (1987). Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass. Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, USA.
Coulon F, Delille D (2003) Effects of biostimulation on growth of indigenous bacteria in sub- Antarctic soil contaminated with oil hydrocarbons. Oil Gas Sci Technol 58:469–479.
Coulon, F., Pelletier, E., Gourhant, L., & Delille, D. (2005). Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Chemosphere, 58(10),
–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.10.007
Graef SP, Andrews JF (1974) Mathematical modeling and control of anaerobic digestion. AIChE Symp Ser 136: 101–131.
Maki, H., Sasaki, T., Haramaya, S. (2005). Photooxidation of biodegradable crude oil and toxicity of the photooxidized products,” Chemosphere, vol. 44, pp. 1145–1151.
Jiang, Y.; Brassington, K.J.; Prpich, G.; Paton, G.I.; Semple, K.T.; Pollard, S.J.; Coulon, F. Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and
nutrient stimulation. Chemosphere 2016, 161, 300–307.
Kumar, V., Kumar, M., & Prasad, R. (2019). Microbial action on hydrocarbons. In Microbial Action on Hydrocarbons. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1840-5
Malina G, Zawierucha I (2007) Potential of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for enhancing intrinsic biodegradation in oil hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Biorem J 11:141–147.
Odokuma LO, Dickson AA (2003) Bioremediation of a crude oil polluted tropical rain forest soil. Global J Environ Sci 2:29–40.
Polyak, Y.M.; Bakina, L.G.; Chugunova, M.V.; Mayachkina, N.V.; Gerasimov, A.O.; Bure, V. Effect of remediation strategies on biological activity of oil-contaminated soil—A field study. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2018, 126, 57–68.
Atlas, R. M. (1975). Effects of temperature and crude oil composition on petroleum biodegradation,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, 30(3), 396–403.
Adebusoye, S. A., Ilori, M. O., Amund, O. O., Teniola, O. D., Olatope, S. O. (2007).Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in a polluted tropical stream, World Journal of
Microbiology and Biotechnology,. 23(8),1149–1159.
Ukpaka, C. P. (2012). The effect of functional parameters on microbial characteristics in crude oil degradation. Journal of Research in Environmental Science and Toxicology, 1(May), 66–90.
Yu L, Wensel PC, Ma J, Chen S (2013). Mathematical Modeling in Anaerobic Digestion (AD). Journal of Bioremediation and Biodegradation S4:003
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.