Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Pre-Contract Advice on Construction Projects: Procurement Assessment for Repair Works on a Flood-Damaged Hospitality Facility

Amadi Alolote Ibim

Abstract


Pre-contract advice on construction projects entails providing strategic expert evaluation at
the upstream phase of procurement. It is an essential part of contract management for routine
work as well as large projects. This study carries out a procurement assessment as part of the
pre-contract cost advisory services for proposed repair works on a hospitality facility,
following damage from a flood disaster event. Using a scenario-based approach, different
methods of procurement were evaluated for their pros and cons. Based on the outcome of the
evaluation, the management contracting method was chosen as the most suitable method for
procuring the repair works. Further to this, a tender evaluation was carried out as a basis for
assessing potential contractors. The tender evaluation was two-pronged- a technical and
financial proposal assessment, which were based on set out criteria. The overall assessment
yielded a recommendation for the preferred contractor on the merits of the highest combined
overall score. The recommended tenderer however did not have the lowest financial bid offer.
Nonetheless, the contractor emerged top, via a nexus of both assessment criteria,
demonstrating that technical and financial considerations are integral to the selection of
contractors for carrying out construction works.


Keywords


Construction, Cost Advice, Precontract, Procurement, Repair Works, Tender Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Constructing Excellence (2009). Collaborative Procurement. Available at

www.constructingexcellence.org.uk. [Accessed 02 March 2022].

Cox, A and Townsend, M. (1997). Latham as half-way house: a relational competence

approach to better practice in construction procurement. Engineering, Construction and

Architectural Management, Vol.4 No. 2, pp.143-158

Davis, M. (1995). Achievements, Action Plans and How Clients Can Help. The Latham

Implementation Plan Conference, 25 - 26 October, Cabot Hall, London

Davis, P., Love, P. and Baccarini, D. (2008). Report: Building Procurement Methods.

Research Project No: 2006-034-C-02. Brisbane, Australia: Icon.Net Pty. Ltd.

De Marco, A. (2011). Project management for facility constructions: A guide for engineers

and architects. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.

Dodd, J and. Langford, D.A. (1990). Construction management on one large project in

London: A case study. Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 385-398,

DOI: 10.1080/01446199000000031

Egan, S. J. and Williams, D. (1998). Rethinking Construction: The report of the Construction

Task Force, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Municipal Engineer, Vol.127

No.4, pp.199–203.

Griffith, A. and Headley, J.D. (1997). Developing an effective approach to the procurement and

management of small building works within large client organizations, Construction Management and

Economics, 13(4), pp.279–289.

Jarkas, A. M and Haupt, T. C. (2015). Major construction risk factors considered by general contractors

in Qatar, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology 13(1): 165–194.

Lahdenpera, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project

partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and

Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 57–79.

Latham, Sir M. (1994). Constructing the Team, Norwich: HMSO.

Love, P.E.D., Skitmore, R. and Earl, G. (1998). Selecting an appropriate procurement method

for the construction process: An empirical study. Construction Management and Economics,

Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 221–233. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/014461998372501.

Luu, D.T., Thomas, S. and Chen, S.E. (2003). Parameters governing the selection of

procurement system: An empirical survey. Engineering, Construction and Architectural

Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 09699980310478458.

Masterman, J.W.E. (2002). An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems. 2nd Ed.

London: E & FN Spon

Mathonsi, M.D. and Thwala, W.D. (2012). Factors influencing the selection of procurement

systems in the South African construction industry. African Journal of Business

Management, Vol. 6 No.10, pp. 3583–3594. https://doi.org/ 10.5897/AJBM10.978.

Mbanjwa, S. (2003). The use and effectiveness of construction management as a building system in

the South African construction industry. M.S. thesis. Pretoria: Univ. Pretoria.

Morledge R. and Sharif A. (1996). The Procurement Guide: A Guide to the Development of an

Appropriate Building Procurement Strategy. RICS.

Muriro, A. & Wood, G. (2010). A comparative analysis of procurement methods used on competitively

tendered office projects in the UK. Proceedings of COBRA, Held 2-3 September, 2010, pp. 1-16.

Dauphine Université, Paris.

Natasa, T. and Car-Pusic, D. (2008). "Design and build" in comparison with the traditional

procurement method and the possibility of its application in the creation constructability.

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Organization, Technology and

Management in Construction. Zagreb, Croatia

Noaum, S.G. (1994). Critical analysis of time and cost of management and traditional

contracts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol 120 No.4, pp 687–705.

https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364 (1994)120:4(687).

Petajaniemi, P. and Lahdenpera, P. (2012). Alliance contracting –one for all and all for one

(Finland). In: European Infrastructure Procurement Symposium, Conflict between

Institutional Frameworks and Managerial Project Practice. Copenhagen, Denmark, 8 May,

pp. 12–15.

RICS. (2011). Contracts in Use, A survey of building contracts in use. The Royal Institution of Chartered

Surveyors (RICS), London

Sawalhi, N.I and Agha, O. (2017). Multi-attribute utility theory for selecting an appropriate

procurement method in the construction projects. Journal of Construction in Developing

Countries, Vol. 22 No.1, pp. 75–96. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2017.22.1.5




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/joprm.v12i3.6992

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.