Comparison of Conventional RCC Columns, Steel Columns and Composite Columns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/josem.v10i3.7534Abstract
Worldwide, the steel industry is expanding almost everywhere. Compared to the USA, EU, and other developed nations, India uses less steel in the construction industry. Additionally, India's cities have some of the highest population densities per square kilometre, which limits horizontal construction growth and favours vertical development. Steel structures are more ductility and can undergo more deflections while concrete structures are larger and attracts more seismic weight. Hybrid construction combines the advantageous characteristics of both the concrete and steel materials. With the aid of the ETAB programme, the static analysis and Response spectrum technique required by IS1893:2002 are carried out for three-dimensional models of the RCC column structure, steel column structure, and composite column structure. Comparative study of RCC column structure, steel column structure and composite column structure for G+10 is included. Furthermore, the paper addresses the economic implications of these structural systems. It compares the initial costs. Overall, the comparative analysis aims to provide engineers, architects, and construction professionals with valuable insights into the selection of the most suitable structural system for a given project. It helps in understanding the strengths and weaknesses of RCC column structures, steel structures, and composite structures, enabling informed decision-making based on project requirements, budget constraints, and performance expectations.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |