Seismic Analysis of G+10 Building With and Without Zipper Brace Frame

Authors

  • Swapnil Suresh Maindre
  • S.B. Salve

Keywords:

Zipper brace frame, high rise building, seismic analysis, lateral displacement, storey drift, base shear, E-tab Software, Is 1893-2016.

Abstract

This paper presents a seismic analysis of a G+10 building with and without Zipper Brace Frame (ZBF). The research begins with a detailed literature review, investigating the existing seismic-resistant techniques employed in high-rise buildings. The Zipper Brace Frame is introduced as an innovative system that has shown promising results in enhancing seismic performance while maintaining architectural aesthetics. Two analytical models are created: one without bracing systems and the other incorporating the Zipper Brace Frame. The seismic analysis is performed using E-tab software capable of simulating dynamic response under different seismic excitations. The seismic performance evaluation includes several key aspects: story drifts, lateral displacements and base shear. The results of the seismic analysis are thoroughly compared and discussed to identify the structural behaviour differences between the without zipper bracing system and the ZBF. Emphasis is placed on the performance of the ZBF in minimizing inter-story drifts, reducing floor accelerations, and enhancing overall building stability during seismic events. Through this comparative study, the seismic effectiveness of the Zipper Brace Frame is validated, and its potential advantages over conventional lateral bracing systems are highlighted. The findings of this research contribute to the knowledge of seismic-resistant technologies and can aid structural engineers and designers in making informed decisions for designing safer and more resilient high-rise buildings in seismic-prone regions.

References

M.Schachter et al., 2007, “Analytical Modeling of Zipper Frames Subjected To Shaking Table

Testing”.

Chuang-Sheng Yang et al., 2008, “Pushover Response of a Braced Frame With Suspended Zipper

Struts”.

A Kadid et al., 2011, “Seismic Assessment of Braced RC Frames”.

K.K. Sangle et al., 2012, “Seismic Analysis of High-Rise Steel Frame with and Without Bracing”.

S. Naeimi et al., 2012, “Study of the Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames”.

Nasim Irani Sarand et al., 2013, “Seismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames; A Review”.

Peter Cada et al., 2017, “Comparison of Methods Used For Seismic Analysis of Structures”.

Eraboina Lalitha et al., 2017, “Seismic Analysis and Design of Residential Building”.

S.P. Shejul et al., 2018, “A Review on Seismic Behavior of Zipper Braced Frames”.

Yasaman Balazadeh-Minouei et al., 2018, “Seismic Retrofit of an Existing 10-Story ChevronBraced Steel-Frame”.

Jaimin Kamal Shah et al., 2018, “Seismic Performance of Zipper Braced Frame Designed by

Performance Based Plastic Design method and Force Based Design Method”.

Kaveh Nezamisavojbolaghi et al., 2019, “Using Concentric and Zipper Steel Braces by Comparison

of Effect on Improved Seismic Performance Level of Concrete Moment Frame Structures with

Moderate Ductility”.

Nasim Irani Sarand et al., 2021, “Seismic Response Investigation of Rocking ZipperBraced Frames

Under Near-Fault Ground Motions”.

Fereshtech Emami et al., 2021, “Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Chevron and SuspendedZipper Braced Frames Under Near-Fault Ground Motion”.

Jeet Kumar Sonwani et al., 2021, “Seismic Collapse Risk Assessment of Braced Frames Under

Near-Fault

Illustrated Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (Dr. S. R. Karve) Eighth Edition, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-23

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 3 (2023)

Section

Research Article

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.