Comparative Study between Conventional and High Strength Concrete

Authors

  • Muzaffar Ahmad Mir
  • Kishan Kumar

Abstract

The current trend of use of superlatives in concrete technology may strike as somewhat disconcerting to many. We had high strength concrete, hyper-plasticizer, and super plasticizers, very reactive Pozzolana, and now high performance concrete. It is difficult to imagine any concrete being manufactured and used, which is not intended to perform to the extent; high performance concrete is not a new material of construction. The sole distinction is the level of performance that is over standard. Acceptance tests are performed with cube testing at 28 days. Wherever sturdiness of concrete is that the actuation for adoption of high performance concrete, unchanged permeable ness tests area unit performed as a matter of routine. In this paper, comparison study is shown between M-40 and M-60 grade of concrete victimization fly ash, oxide fume and sikament admixture. The compressive strength, flow table and slump table tests area unit performed on the concrete and check the compressive strength once seven and twenty eight days.
Keywords: Admixture, Fly ash, Silica Fume, Sikament, Compressive Strength

Downloads

Published

2020-12-11

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2016)

Section

Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.