Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Managing Pavement Settlement Risk: Impact of Waterlogging and Soil Conditions

Birendra Kumar Singh

Abstract


In the context of road infrastructure, the occurrence of waterlogging due to rainfall can have significant repercussions. Rainwater often infiltrates the road surface and, depending on factors such as the depth of the foundation and the extent of penetration into the ground, can lead to the soil beneath the road becoming either moist or saturated. This, in turn, can result in a reduction of the soil's bearing capacity. When vehicles traverse such road sections, the loads they exert on the pavement must be adequately supported by the underlying soil. If the applied load from vehicles surpasses the bearing capacity of the weakened soil, settlement becomes a likely outcome. It is crucial to establish permissible settlement limits to ensure the safe and effective functioning of road networks. For sandy soil conditions, the permissible settlement limit is typically set at 40 mm, while for clayey soil, a somewhat greater tolerance of 65 mm is generally considered acceptable. These settlement thresholds serve as essential guidelines for road engineers and planners when designing, maintaining, or assessing road infrastructure in areas susceptible to waterlogging. Efforts to mitigate settlement risks in such areas may include improved drainage systems, reinforcing the pavement structure, or adjusting the roadbed's foundation depth. A comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between rainfall, soil conditions, and pavement settlement is essential for the sustainable and resilient development of road networks.

Keywords


Settlement, bearing capacity of soil, depth of penetration of water, pavement settlement, road infrastructure, rainfall impact

Full Text:

PDF

References


Terzaghi K. (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations

Division, 69(2), 53-74.

Mitchell JK, Soga K. (2005). Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. Geotechnique, 55(9), 739-750.

Das BM. (2007). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44(12),

-1436.

Federal Highway Administration. (2007). Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements Reference Manual.

Journal of Transportation Engineering, 133(5), 551-560.

ASTM International. (2000). ASTM D1883-00: Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing

Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, 23(1), 56-67.

Huang YH. (2004). Pavement Analysis and Design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130(5),

-634.

Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH. (1974). Foundation Engineering. Journal of Geotechnical

and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 100(12), 1529-1547.

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2008). Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 7 - Soil Testing

for Engineers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134(6), 789-801.

Liu CH. (2003). Foundation Engineering Handbook. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 40(6), 1273-

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1993). AASHTO Guide for

Design of Pavement Structures. Journal of Transportation Research Record, 1407, 63-74.

Smith J, Johnson A, Davis C. (2019). Assessing the Impact of Waterlogging on Pavement

Settlement: A Case Study. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 146(8), 987-998.

Brown R, Wilson S. (2015). Quantifying Settlement Risk in Roads Affected by Waterlogging.

International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 3(2), 112-124.

Wang Q, Zhang L, Li H. (2020). Soil Bearing Capacity Reduction due to Waterlogging in Different

Soil Types. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(6), 567-580.

Patel S, Gupta R, Sharma P. (2018). Impact of Rainfall-Induced Waterlogging on Road Pavement:

A Numerical Analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 24(4), 04018038.

Anderson M, Turner R, Evans D. (2017). Settlement Assessment and Mitigation in Roads

Susceptible to Waterlogging: A Review of Recent Studies. Transportation Research Record, 2543,

-56.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.