Evaluation of Pulley Performance, Pulley Machine, and its Benefits and Drawbacks

Rohit rana

Abstract


A rope is simply looped over a grouping of one or more wheels to create a pulley, which makes it simpler to lift anything. The force exerted by the body can be effectively multiplied by the use of a pulley. A wheel with a flexible rope, rope, cable, chain, or belt on its rim is referred to as a "pulley.". It is simpler to raise objects when using pulleys since they may shift the direction of the force. Numerous pulley types make a variety of lifting and moving operations simpler. These are categorised according to variations in the force's magnitude, direction, and both magnitude and force. A rope, wheel, and axle make up the pulley system. An axle supports a wheel with grooves. The primary purpose of the pulley system is to raise big objects with minimal effort. The word "pull" is most likely where the term "pulley" originated. One of the most popular mechanical devices, pulleys can be utilised for a variety of simple to sophisticated tasks. The earliest use of pulleys was to lift a bucket of water out of wells. The earliest use of pulleys was to lift a bucket of water out of wells.


Keywords


Keywords: wheel and axle, pulley system, pull, hoist, rope.

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


J.R. Anderson and E. Skwarecki, "The Automated Tutoring of Introductory Computer Programming", Comm. ACM, vol. 29, pp. 842-849, 1986.

R. Baker, J. Walonoski, N. Heffernan, I. Roll, A. Corbett and K. Koedinger, "Why Students Engage in Gaming the System Behavior in Interactive Learning Environments", J. Interactive Learning Research, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 185-224, 2008.

B.G. Buchanan and E.H. Shortliffe, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project., 1985.

C. Conati, A. Gertner, K. VanLehn and M. Druzdzel, "On-Line Student Modeling for Coached Problem Solving Using Bayesian Networks", Proc. Sixth Int'l Conf. User Modeling, pp. 231-242, 1997.

T. De Jong and W.R. Van Joolingen, "Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains", Rev. Educational Research, vol. 68, pp. 179-202, 1998.

N.D. Finkelstein, W.K. Adams, C.J. Keller, P.B. Kohl, K.K. Perkins and N.S. Podolefsky, "When Learning about the Real World is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment", Physical Rev. Special Topics - Physics Education Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10103, 2005.

D. Fossati, B.D. Eugenio, C. Brown, S. Ohlsson, D. Cosejo and L. Chen, "Supporting Computer Science Curriculum: Exploring and Learning Linked Lists with iList", IEEE Trans. Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 107-120, Apr.-June 2009.

R.J. Mislevy and D.H. Gitomer, "The Role of Probability-Based Inference in an Intelligent Tutoring System", User-Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 253-282, 1996.

B.M. McLaren, K.E. DeLeeuw and R.E. Mayer, "Polite Web-Based Intelligent Tutors: Can They Improve Learning in Classrooms?", Computers and Education, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 574-584, 2011.

J. Minstrell, "Student Thinking and Related Assessment: Creating a Facet-Based Learning Environment Chapter 3 in: Grading the Nation's Report Card: Research from the Evaluation of NAEP", Nat'l Research Council, pp. 44-73, 2000.

C. Murray and K. VanLehn, "A Comparison of Decision-Theoretic Fixed-Policy and Random Tutorial Action Selection", Proc. Eighth Int'l Conf. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 116-123, 2006.

B.J. Reiser, J.R. Anderson and R.G. Farrell, "Dynamic Student Modeling in an Intelligent Tutor for LISP Programming", Proc. Int'l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 8-14, 1985.

J. Tan and G. Biswas, "Simulation-Based Game Learning Environments: Building and Sustaining a Fish Tank", Proc. First IEEE Int'l Workshop Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning, pp. 73-80, 2007.

D. Tsovaltzi, N. Rummel, B.M. McLaren, N. Pinkwart, O. Scheuer, A. Harrer, et al., "Extending a Virtual Chemistry Laboratory with a Collaboration Script to Promote Conceptual Learning", Int'l J. Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 2, pp. 91-110, 2010.

L.M. Triona, D. Klahr and C. Williams, "Point or Click or Building by Hand: Comparing the Effects of Physical versus Virtual Materials on Middle School Students' Ability to Optimize an Engineering Design", Proc. 27th Ann. Conf. Cognitive Science Soc., pp. 2202-2205, 2005.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37591/tmd.v9i2.6648

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.